[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 1:50 PM +0000 2/13/02, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>2) "..there's no way for an XML processor to tell whether QNames are
> used in values." (again, quoting Lenz [2], ellipses in original)
>
>That's simply false -- any sensible use of QNames would involve a W3C
>XML Schema or other type-assigning schema language, which in turn
>would identify all element content and/or attribute values which were
>QNames. This means that using type-aware XPath 2.0 it would be
>trivial to locate all QNames in a document. Note further that any
>sensible API for type-information-bearing infosets will expose the
>_values_ of leaf nodes, which for QNames is defined as being a pair of
>namespace name and local name.
>
No, that's simply true. Many of us aren't using schema-aware parsers.
Most of us who are still don't have access to the PSVI type
information in our applications. Even if we did, most of the
documents we get in practice wouldn't have schemas.
QNames in attribute values and element content are a huge mess and a
big mistake. I've seen them complexify virtually every significant
system I've worked on that had to process arbitrary XML documents.
They were a problem for JDOM. They were a problem for XInclude. They
were a problem when using DOM and SAX. They make XML significantly
more complex.
--
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) |
| http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/ |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ |
| Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
