[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, John Cowan wrote:
> That means that they are not equivalent in *convenience*.
> When I say they are equivalent in power, I mean it in the
> same sense that assembly language and Prolog are said to be equivalent
> in power: they are both Turing-complete.
Noooo! I knew it'd come to this.
ABS
|