[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Thursday 14 February 2002 12:25, you wrote:
> It should be clear up front what "flavor" of URI you have, and
> whether it does or does not denote some retrievable resource
> or whether it denotes some abstract resource -- or if it is
> in fact the actual resource (consider a data: URI). And that
> should be based on a formal classification of URI schemes and
> URI classes.
I always thought that's what the URN / URL distinction was for, but the W3C
went and specified namespace URIs instead of URNs. Bastards.
ABS
--
Alaric B. Snell
http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/ http://www.warhead.org.uk/
Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software
|
