[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
That's a fact. I think as you said earlier, the WSIO
is about making sure it works. If not, they have
XML-Dev to inquire to for alternatives, and without
fail, we'll have them.
len
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Champion [mailto:mc@xegesis.org]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:25 PM
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record
Straight
2/15/2002 2:55:57 PM, "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com> wrote:
>A bad song that sells
>platinum stays around longer than a good one
>that sells a thousand copies to friends and relatives.
I can't point to specific examples in pop music
(my musical tastes hit the wall at about
1827) but I seem to recall tales of phenomenally popular
acts that are hyped to the stratosphere, yet their
CDs *stay* on the loading docks if the hype diverges
from the reality of public taste. There's no doubt
that the "SOAP-RPC as the grand unification of DCOM and
CORBA" paradigm looks like a monster hit from the early
orders, but it has to actually WORK in order to stay
on the charts.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
