OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

The ad in today's USA Today from IBM describes 
e-business as the new "utility", and similar to 
other utilities, should just be a system that 
one hooks up to and gets services.  It doesn't 
note that:

1.  Most utilities are publicly regulated.
2.  They provide a service based on the going 
    availability (eg, power, gas, etc)
3.  They are sometimes publicly owned but 
    where not, should have competitors and when 
    they don't, abuse their customers.

We are in for a weird time here.  I don't have a 
good feeling about a "utlity" that has a monopoly 
power over business processes that I need to survive 
and more than I feel "love" for the local electric 
and gas service vendors who raise rates to make 
us pay more if we use less.


-----Original Message-----
From: Steven R. Newcomb [mailto:srn@coolheads.com]

According to my theory (Perspective 1 vs. Perspective 2,
the reason why is that these things put the Perspective
1 guys in control of Perspective 2's assets.  It's not
surprising that MS and IBM can agree on things that are
designed to keep the balance of power on the side of
the system vendors.  UDDI and SOAP do not threaten the
hegemony of Perspective 1.  Quite the contrary, in

When considering these system-vendor-originated
proposals, it's important not only to examine what's
there, but also to figure out *what's missing* -- what
would be there if the information owners were designing
these things, but isn't, because they're not.


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS