Lists Home |
Date Index |
Title: RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools?
I tried "worst sgml tool" (including the quotes) on Google....
It doesn't exist.
From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:38 PM
To: 'Eric van der Vlist'; email@example.com
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools?
Well, Google doesn't know how to lie, so
we'll just have to accept that as gospel.
Remember, it is a "how many and who links
to who" system. So the majority opinion
of the right folks is:
1. Worse is better.
2. XML Spy is worse.
3. Buy XML Spy and be the worst XML
guy in your company.
But what do old SGMLers know about
these modern inventions for data centric
XML? Really, not much. I went looking
for that XML Spy girl and realized she
was already hanging with someone even
worse than me. ;-)
From: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
According to Google, the two worse XML tools are XML Spy and Tamino:
Could sponsored links be counter productive?
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
The information transmitted by this e-mail message is intended solely for the use of the person to whom or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Disclosure, dissemination, distribution, review, retransmission to, other use of or taking any action in reliance upon this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disseminate, distribute or copy this communication, by e-mail or otherwise. Instead, please notify us immediately by return e-mail (including the original message with your reply) and then delete and discard all copies of the message.
Although we have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting viruses we nevertheless advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We accept no liability for any loss or damage caused by viruses.