Lists Home |
Date Index |
Title: RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools?
tools like OmniMark are in the "better is better"
category. So that won't find them. And I don't think
has written a better SGML parser since SP.
said, don't take this to mean I advocate going
to SGML over XML. For most applications,
would be overkill. I can live with it just fine.
heck, I like XML Spy. Useful when used in
conjunction with Topologi validator that last time
tested it, caught errors Spy let pass.
have a quibble or two with Falk over his
comments in XML Journal, but arrogance of that
is typical XML marketing. It's only bad if
typical of the W3C Advisors. That is what
spawned the WSIO.
I tried "worst sgml tool" (including the quotes) on
It doesn't exist.