[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Title: RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools?
Sadly,
tools like OmniMark are in the "better is better"
category. So that won't find them. And I don't think
anyone
has written a better SGML parser since SP.
That
said, don't take this to mean I advocate going
back
to SGML over XML. For most applications,
that
would be overkill. I can live with it just fine.
And
heck, I like XML Spy. Useful when used in
conjunction with Topologi validator that last time
I
tested it, caught errors Spy let pass.
I may
have a quibble or two with Falk over his
comments in XML Journal, but arrogance of that
kind
is typical XML marketing. It's only bad if
it is
typical of the W3C Advisors. That is what
spawned the WSIO.
len
I tried "worst sgml tool" (including the quotes) on
Google....
It doesn't exist.
Wilco.
| 