OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   RE: [xml-dev] Two sides of SOAP (was RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and R EST an

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@ingr.com]

<snip/>

> I'm sold on 
> 
> 1.  Training before development of web services. 
> 2.  Inspection prior to deployment of web services.
> 3.  Security testing suites.
> 4.  Properly constructed contracts for web services 
>     that include security provisions and remediation clauses.
> 
> Which is how the best will do business anyway and buying 
> less than quality is a mistake to begin with.  I think that 
> list above is a good one for the WSIO to consider.

That sounds great to me.

> I'm not sold on but convinced that web services will result 
> in some web service business types becoming regulated businesses 
> just as the utilities are.  It will take some years and 
> a change of administration for that to happen, and probably, 
> a catastrophe to get their attention.

Yeah, and unfortunately I think you are right that it will take a
catastrophe -- and even then they will most likely botch it. The government
doesn't have a good track record of *intelligent* regulation of
technology-related matters. Anti-hacker efforts, for instance, seem to have
put more whistle-blowers and good-samaritans in jail then malicious hackers.
It would be wise for the industry to get out in front of this issue. It
would be very wise for the WSIO to take this up.
 




 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS