[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Bill de hÓra wrote:
> To respond to the first paragraph above. You don't need paternal
> specifications to protect your applications from change. You need
> better developers.
OTH, a successful technology is a technology which *real* developers can
deal with :) ... and I think that a specification which pretends to be
eXtensible could have done a better job in the domain!
Eric
--
See you in Seattle.
http://knowledgetechnologies.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
