xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its

Re: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".)
From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 08:32:23 +0000
In-reply-to: <200203060138.g261ctu10329@dragon.flightlab.com>
References: <2X3W74B8GAHBN4Z63D8A6KFZIHHGNJ.3c855805@MChamp><2X3W74B8GAHBN4Z63D8A6KFZIHHGNJ.3c855805@MChamp>

[Joe English]

>The general idea of Infoset augmentation is I think very useful,
>but I'm starting to think that doing it as part of validation
>is not a good idea.

Amen.

Sean

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserveits "X".)
  - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".)
  - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>

Prev by Date: Visiting your cake and eating it too (was Stupid Question)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Visiting your cake and eating it too (was Stupid Question)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Visiting your cake and eating it too (was StupidQuestion)
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Stupid Question (was RE: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS