Lists Home |
Date Index |
Michael Brennan wrote:
> > From: Leigh Dodds [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> > I don't think Jonathan put this into the spec, but I notice that number
> > the examples in the spec (do a View Source) follow this guideline.
> This approach is also described in the "Software-related purposes" doc
> which is referenced by the "well known purposes" doc, which is referenced
> the spec.
>  http://www.openhealth.org/RDDL/purposes/software
Right. The way to name purposes and natures is outside the RDDL spec. The
"purposes" http://www.rddl.org/purposes and "natures"
http://www.rddl.org/natures documents describe conventions for using
purposes and natures. Note that I do not promise to keep the RDDL spec on
the openhealth.org server (and if I only knew how to configure my apache
virtual server correctly, there would be no trace of RDDL being on
openhealth.org at all ... oh well). In any case, use the