xml-dev - RE: SV: [xml-dev] Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"

RE: SV: [xml-dev] Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'veillard@redhat.com'" <veillard@redhat.com>, "Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI" <jens.jakob.andersen@post.dk>
Subject: RE: SV: [xml-dev] Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:36:50 -0600
Cc: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org

Of which I generally only need one... same as SGML.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard@redhat.com]

  There is also like 50 times more implementations.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SV: [xml-dev] Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
  - From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
Next by Date: (off-topic) RISC
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
Next by thread: Re: SV: [xml-dev] Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS