xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Does XML-Dev matter?

Re: [xml-dev] Does XML-Dev matter?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Does XML-Dev matter?
From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: 19 Mar 2002 19:45:31 -0500
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020319174627.037c6f88@157.189.161.214>
References: <72VPEC52C0626ZZ0VUE0QM2YOIIDC7.3c926d9d@MChamp> <5.1.0.14.0.20020319174627.037c6f88@157.189.161.214>

On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 17:49, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> How well has the consensus on XML-Dev predicted whether a technology 
> matters in the commercial market? Do we have enough data to do a 
> retrospective? What were the surprises that were more successful than we 
> had expected? What were the wonderful technologies that simply didn't succeed?

Does the commercial market matter?

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

References:
- Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
  - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
- Does XML-Dev matter?
  - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@softwareag.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] do leading indicators matter?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] does the semantic web matter?
Previous by thread: Does XML-Dev matter?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Does XML-Dev matter?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread