Lists Home |
Date Index |
Mike Champion wrote:
> In general, though, you would be well-advised to not try to compress
> arbitrary text better than gzip can. You'll fail.
http://sources.redhat.com/bzip2/index.html is gradually gaining wider
acceptance and distribution. I'd say it's where gzip was in 1993-94. It's a
little more CPU intensive but is also consistently better than gzip.
Coincidentally with the recent discussions on xml-dev, I see the author is a
functional programming fan :)
mike j. brown | xml/xslt: http://skew.org/xml/
denver/boulder, colorado, usa | resume: http://skew.org/~mike/resume/