[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> (http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=10
45223 -- like
> > > a good reactionary I read reactionary rags)
>
> I think that's the first time I've heard the Economist described as
> *reactionary*.
Well, I don't *really* consider myself to be a reactionary either (but at
least one person on this list does!). That statement was firmly
tongue-in-cheek...
Matt
|