Lists Home |
Date Index |
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 07:20:21PM +0100, Richard Tobin wrote:
> It's intended that Namespaces 1.1 will be strongly tied to XML 1.1, so
> that it will only apply to XML 1.1 documents. XML 1.0-only parsers
> will reject documents labelled 1.1 anyway, and Namespaces-1.1-aware
> processors will apply Namespaces 1.0 to 1.0 documents and Namespaces
> 1.1 to 1.1 documents.
Then why do we need a requirements document for Namespaces 1.1 per se?
Is there a good argument why Namespaces-1.1 *shouldn't* be rolled
into the XML-1.1 req/draft? So what if XML-1.1 is a few pages
larger; the post-hoc addition of Namespaces to XML has caused a
lot of problems over the years.
Removing an external requirement/dependency should be a *good* thing here.