[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Ooops, looks like a part of my post went away!
Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> Joe English wrote:
>
> What about declaring those documents?
>
> <?sanity type="normal|sane|neurotic|psychotic"?>
>
> with a default value of psychotic (unfortunately, but you can't assume
> documents to be normal nor even sane) would allow consumers to adapt
> their behavior or even to reject documents they don't like...
>
> An adaptation of Evan's transformation could easily add this PI to
> existing documents... a "lite XML" or "XML light").
Need to read here:
All this makes me thing that we should resurect Common XML (or create a
"lite XML" or "XML light").
>
> There are lots of additions to do with new specs such as W3C XML Schema,
> XPointer or XPath 2.0 and an increasing need too!
>
> Thanks for this delicious food for thoughts!
>
> Eric
Sorry,
Eric
--
See you in Barcelona.
http://www.xmleurope.com/2002/schedule.asp
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
