[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Saturday 13 April 2002 10:50, AndrewWatt2000@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 12/04/02 21:04:14 GMT Daylight Time, clbullar@ingr.com
> writes:
> > That said, the real problem is not having more than
> > one (Adobe) or two (batik) SVG viewers. That isn't
> > healthy.
>
> Agreed, but it is only 7 months since SVG reached Rec status.
Wrong answer. SVG is hard to implement, it's only 7 months since the REC, but
we already have *10* viewers for various platforms, at various levels of
development. There are also 3 editors that support SVG natively, many that
export, dozens of conversion tools, and all sorts of generation systems.
Implementation-wise, SVG is doing very well. Much better than, say, SWF.
> It wouldn't suprise me to see MS produce SVG viewing capabilities, possibly
> native to IE. But I guess that would mean sidelining VML, which MS may be
> reluctant to do.
From what I heard, VML is already sidelined. At least, for all I can see it
stopped shipping.
PS: Andrew, is there *any* hope that you will ever get your mailer to work?
...Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"; name="Attachment: 1"...
--
_______________________________________________________________________
Robin Berjon <robin@knowscape.com> -- CTO
k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Radioactive cats have 18 half-lives.
|
