OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: [xml-dev] lots of WS reading material

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Good point, but I think we use XML for reasons 
other than the Infoset.  A syntax-based spec 
is why we can say "XML Doesn't Care" and mean 
it.  Markup is not about messaging per se. 
It is about having a descriptive format that 
can reliably be used to move information 
without loss.   The trick is that when the 
Dumpster gets full, you can reach in and 
sort the information out of the garbage.  

Does the Infoset warranty that as well as 
XML 1.0?  Granted, it can be done with other 
syntaxes as well, and most of us know, it gets 
down to choosing one and sticking with it.

Someone asked the other day how such an 
ugly thing as SGML could have beaten its 
competitors.  A GS-zed I knew in DoD told 
me, when the time came to choose, it was 
the only workable solution among a lot of 
other ugly solutions.  It seemed that the 
nature of the problem bred uglyness and 
all that mattered was functionality.


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Champion [mailto:mc@xegesis.org]

Don't be so sure. SOAP doesn't care about angle brackets;
1.2 is based on the InfoSet.  Just as the WS-* vision abstracts
away HTTP and URIs so that they can be replaced with something
new and better, it abstracts away XML syntax, and could replace
it with a binary format, C# object declaration syntax, or
anything else that can be parsed into an InfoSet.  XML as we
know it may find itself in the Dumpster along with HTTP and
URIs before long.


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS