|
|
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Successes (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Culture and Aims )
|
[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
In a message dated 26/04/02 11:29:29 GMT Daylight Time, michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com writes:
Without clear, insightful and explicit aims we may find that W3C has produced answers of high engineering quality to the wrong questions.
That would be bad engineering.
Michael,
At face value your response indicates that W3C is "guilty" (for want of a better term) of bad engineering if it has produced solutions in the absence of clear and defined aims.
Would you care, then, to offer - either on a personal or quasi-official basis - answers to the fundamental questions I posed in my previous email regarding the scope and purpose of W3C's activities?
Andrew Watt
|
|
|
|
|
|