[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I think there's something missing here to make the notion of 'on the Web'
more useful. Perhaps
- it *can* be on the web if it can be identified
- it *is* on the web if it [?? or some representation of it ??] is
identified by a URI, in other words [?? if there is a resource representing
it corresponding to that URI (not a 404?) ??]
- whether on the web or not, there might be other ways to access it (not
via a URI and GET)
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
To: "Bill de hÓra" <dehora@eircom.net>
Cc: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>; "'Jonathan Robie'"
<jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>; <AndrewWatt2000@aol.com>;
<michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>; <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] What is "the Web"
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 05:18:21PM +0100, Bill de hÓra wrote:
> > By your definition, can you name something that isn't on the web?
>
> No, because by naming something, you identify it. And all things that
> are identifiable can be on the Web.
|
