[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I've read it, in fact I read and gave feedback on one of the earlier drafts on the section on named typing before it went public.
You are right, reading it is punishment (however, not as bad a punishment as having to read the W3C XML Schema Structures recommendation).
Amusingly enough, my day job requires me to be familiar with both aforementioned documents. So what exactly was your point again?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:jborden@attbi.com]
Sent: Sat 5/4/2002 7:13 AM
To: Dare Obasanjo; Patrick Lehti; uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate (was New XSLT, XPath, and XQuery drafts - but still no update?)
Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Secondly, XQuery doesn't really have a type system
> because it uses W3C XML Schema which is a validation
> system.
Gasp. As punishment for saying such things you should be forced to read
http://www.w3.org/TR/query-semantics/
Jonathan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
