[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> Simon St. Laurent:
> Once again, is this a criticism of the whole notion of associating an XML
> document with a schema, or with XSD itself?
Speaking for myself, I have absolutely no problem whatsoever with the general idea of using a schema. Indeed I think it is good practice to declare the classes of valid XML.
My problem is with XSDL. And even if XSDL were near perfect, I think it would still be a bad idea to weld its constructs into the heart of every other XML spec.
> I haven't even read the XPath 2.0 spec yet. It looked pretty scary coming
> out of the printer just now. But the tight integration of XSD with other
> specs, which frightens me, shouldn't be confused with the overall potential
> of XML schema to enable a whole new class of XML processing apps.
Total passionate agreement.
--
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Track chair, XML/Web Services One (San Jose, Boston): http://www.xmlconference.com/
DAML Reference - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/05/01/damlref.html
RDF Query using Versa - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think10/index.html
XML, The Model Driven Architecture, and RDF @ XML Europe - http://www.xmleurope.com/2002/kttrack.asp#themodel
|
