OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

> > A Schematron assertion (that the node list is non-null) would then always
> > fail, even at "compile" time.
> > 
> > I think this behavior would be _better_ for Schematron.
> How can that be better for schematron? It completely breaks the whole
> purpose of the schematron schema, which is to find the "bad" markup and
> to report the occurrences to the user. Having your schematron schema
> fail to compile because it is looking for illegal cases means that
> almost all schematron schema would not compile.

A followup, and to be crystal clear, I did not mean to imply
that the Schematron schema would fail to "compile" whatever
that means (I suppose it would be some sort of static type

What I said is that the "assertion would fail" that is it
would be known that an assertion, which depends on a 
particular node set being not null, i.e. not empty, would 
_never be true_ as long as the XML document was e.g. XSD valid.

The Schematron schema would be entirely "correct" -- assertions
are intended to "fail" i.e. trigger some event when that
which is asserted is "not true" i.e. "null"



News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS