[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Correct. Now, can someone assert that having XML conform
to one might make that problem
1. Easier
2. Harder
3. Go away.
4. None of the above.
Will I also have XSD versions for
each one of the three with some slight overlaps?
And for each edge system to be integrated, the
same problem?
Ummm.... SOAP/RPC looks better and better.
len
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]
On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 14:02, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Urr... that list I posted was in my queue specifically
> because we have to worry about precisely that. For any
> vendor that sells in different market tiers, it becomes
> necessary to use different backend database system with
> different price break options. In our case, we have
> to support three different backend relational systems,
> and if XML obligates us to datatype definitions, four.
And you've been unable to convince the backend vendors to conform to a
single type system?
Alas.
|
