[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Yes. And RDF that statement since they are saying What XML Is.
Then the next time this thread starts up, we'll ask
the Web itself to answer authoritatively.
len
From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com]
At 09:53 AM 5/9/2002 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>I think Simon is taking a conservative view of what XML is,
>and that is why one repeats the question from time to time,
>what is Core. Some say XML 1.0, others say XML 1.0
>plus namespaces, some say XML 1.0 plus
>(name a subset of all the specs written for processing
>XML in one context or another).
Currently, I would say that you can be compliant to XML 1.0, XML 1.0 plus
namespace, or XML 1.0 plus namespaces and schema, but there is no one thing
called XML, and there is no official statement whether these are all now
conformance levels of XML, or perhaps one or more of these has been superceded.
Would you want the W3C to make an official statement about this?
|
