Lists Home |
Date Index |
I asked about that in response to a query from
my boss about how we would solve the versioning
for schema designs. Issues of knowing, for example,
what version one had without having to open the
schema and look at an attribute were mentioned,
(eg, easy to version the file name but that
raises other hairy problems), so the attribute
was the easiest. Of course, that made it a
non-compliant schema, but when the spec fails,
to provide needed facilities, one is back to
using common practice.
From: Alaric Snell [mailto:email@example.com]
On Friday 10 May 2002 14:20, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Some have. Versioning threads started a few years ago.
I fondly remember versioning of namespace URIs, which is heavily related, but
not versioning within schemas that get given the same namespace URI which is
what I'm angling at here...