[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I think that you are right. Generating the PSVI is not
that complex for most of its fields (except validation).
Therefore it is better to regenerate it for compactness
reason. Of course the schema has to be known by the
parser.
Ronald Bourret wrote:
>
> "Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> > The PSVI seems (to me) to be practically begging for a more appropriate
> > transmission format than XML.
>
> Are people really asking to transmit it? I'm not sure I see the point in
> that.
>
> I've always assumed people would transmit the XML instance and a schema
> and that the processor would generate the PSVI (or those parts of it
> relevant to the application).
>
> -- Ron
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
--
______________________________________________
** NEW ADDRESS **
- - - - - - - - -
Claude Seyrat
EXPWAY
17, rue du Pont aux Choux
75003 Paris, France
T: +33 1 44 54 29 28
M: +33 6 07 66 26 63
F: +33 1 44 54 90 49
E: claude.seyrat@expway.fr
www.expway.tv
|