xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0

Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: jeni@jenitennison.com
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 11:28:58 +0100
Cc: evan@evanlenz.net, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <1181819988344.20020513112423@jenitennison.com> (message fromJeni Tennison on Mon, 13 May 2002 11:24:23 +0100)
References: <NDBBLMPNADEOOKGELJALMEBICJAA.evan@evanlenz.net><200205130917.KAA23038@penguin.nag.co.uk> <1181819988344.20020513112423@jenitennison.com>


> Do you think that it would make sense for the *only* validation to be
> done on a document to be validation dictated by the stylesheet?

yes.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
  - From: "Evan Lenz" <evan@evanlenz.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
  - From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 )
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread