xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0

Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 13:53:01 -0400
In-reply-to: <p0433010bb90598b21f6f@[192.168.254.4]>

5/13/2002 12:22:47 PM, Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> wrote:
>
>
>I wouldn't even go so far as to include integers. XPath 1.0/XSLT 1.0 
>works prett well with just floating point numbers.

Fine with me ... I for one could live with a minimal XPath 2 conformance level
that supported the W3C XSD types string, boolean, dateTime, and double.

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
  - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread