Lists Home |
Date Index |
At 08:10 PM 5/13/2002 -0400, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
> > Neither. It's a topic that's right on top of the current task force
> > In fact, it's almost funny how timely your note is regarding this. In any
> > case, future drafts will likely deal more explicitly with error handling
> > issues.
>Good to know, Evan. Thanks.
Yep. The language is finally getting to where it is precisely defined
enough that it makes sense to start nailing down error handling. Until the
last published specs, we just weren't far enough along to do this. Now we are.