xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?

Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 21:28:11 -0400
Cc: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>, xml-dev<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
References: <3CE193C0.7290457C@rpbourret.com> <1021424632.5238.22.camel@marajen>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020417

> One specification, containing types for the document folks (ID,
> NMTOKEN), for the C-influenced folks (short, unsignedThisAndThat), for
> the database folks (gHorribleKludge).

You're exactly right!  That's the most concise problem definition I've 
seen.  Thanks.

 > Apart from XML, no language on
> earth can natively type this stuff.

One typesys to rule them, and in the darkness bind them.

	/r$

References:
- Objections to / uses of PSVI?
  - From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?
  - From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread