[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Mike Champion wrote:
> It's unfortunate that the debate has been cast in terms of
> "characters" vs "types." It should be about "which types are so
> universal that they can be supported deep in XML without undermining
> the reasons for its success" and "how can type information be passed
> around in a way that is useful for type-aware applications and
> unobtrusive to character-only applications."
Agreed.
-- Ron
|