Re: [xml-dev] a standards story

[Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>]

5/17/2002 1:24:27 PM, Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com> wrote:


>Of course HTML 3 to 3.2 was the IETF to W3C transition -- not a W3C vote 
>rejecting a W3C produced draft.

So who rejected "HTML 3.0" as being overly ambitious/complex?  Setting the
stage for HTML 3.2, which was more of an attempt to learn from what 
actually worked in real browsers.

That's my recollection of something I read and lost track of, so apologies
if this is incorrect.