OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • To: "Arjun Ray" <aray@nyct.net>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
  • Subject: RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
  • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
  • Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 21:43:42 -0700
  • Thread-index: AcIAQErfptIb77f3RzGKEvo50P/VwgAQR6bA
  • Thread-topic: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arjun Ray [mailto:aray@nyct.net] 
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 1:52 PM
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
> 
> 
> 
> | and would involve their users having to learn separate syntaxes
> 
> When was the last time you hand-composed a SOAP message for 
> dispatch in all its pointy bracket glory?

On reexamination, I can't fault your arguments although I would like to
point out one thing. Even though the current trend is to utilize SOAP
for distributed object calls in scenarios where the fact that XML is
used as the data format for the protocol is primarily incidental, there
seems to be a trend amongst the SOAP folks [from reading their blogs I
admit] to alter this usage pattern to more document-centric and message
based uses. If such uses of SOAP ever gained popularity then the fact
that SOAP uses pointy brackets would be extremely significant after all.


-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Any given program, when running, is obsolete. 
 
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 
You assume all risk for your use. (c) 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All
rights reserved.







 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS