FOCUS AREAS
|
XML-DEV
|
XML.org DAILY NEWSLINK
|
REGISTRY
|
RESOURCES
|
ABOUT
xml-dev
Last updated: Sun Mar 16 16:54:28 2003
1123 messages in chronological order |
Thread Index
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
- From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
- From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Re: Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation?
- From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
CHAT: Bagels and lox
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS
- From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Problem
- From: Henrik Motakef <henrik.motakef@web.de>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Problem
- From: "Sebastian A." <sebi@xinium.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Problem
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
XML Problem
- From: "Sebastian A." <sebi@xinium.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS
- From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS
- From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@earthlink.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS
- From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@catcode.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS
- From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@catcode.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS
- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS
- From: "Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@wyeast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Non-xml syntax for WXS
- From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation? (was: RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML)
- From: MAISONNY Benoit <Benoit.MAISONNY@eurocontrol.int>
Re: [xml-dev] Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation? (was: RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML)
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation? (was: RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML)
- From: MAISONNY Benoit <Benoit.MAISONNY@eurocontrol.int>
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Unique XForms form that can ...instance data?
- From: tariq abdur-rahim <ecliptoid330@yahoo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Are there any limits? (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema)
- From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
- From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Are there any limits? (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object p rogrammers: was Announce: XML Schema)
- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Are there any limits? (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema)
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
- From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>
RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
- From: MAISONNY Benoit <Benoit.MAISONNY@eurocontrol.int>
RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema
- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
- From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@mozquito.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
- From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
- From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@mozquito.com>
XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML
- From: MAISONNY Benoit <Benoit.MAISONNY@eurocontrol.int>
Re: [xml-dev] Partial validation in RelaxNG?
- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Partial validation in RelaxNG?
- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Partial validation in RelaxNG?
- From: Gustaf Liljegren <gustaf.liljegren@xml.se>
Proposal for an introspector collaboration toolchain
- From: James Michael DuPont <mdupont777@yahoo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce:XML Schema,
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
[XPB4J] RE: What's XSLT doing in here?
- From: "KUMAR,PANKAJ (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <pankaj_kumar@hp.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] English sentences,was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE
- From: "Kimberly Hahn" <Kimberly.Hahn@enform.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce:XMLSchema,
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
Re: [xml-dev] English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XMLSchema,
- From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
[ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 1.2 - available also Online as an Applet
- From: "George Cristian Bina" <george@sync.ro>
Re: [xml-dev] English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XMLSchema,
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
grammar
- From: "Nurul Haszeli Ahmad" <haszeli@ibtech.com.my>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema,The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] XML schema for non-XML file?
- From: "Michael Leditschke" <mike@ammd.com.au>
[ANNOUNCE] XPB4J-0.90: Java Program to measure and compare XML Parsing/Processing performance
- From: "KUMAR,PANKAJ (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <pankaj_kumar@hp.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML schema for non-XML file?
- From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@earthlink.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
XML schema for non-XML file?
- From: Yaneric Roussel <yroussel@speedware.com>
OASIS announcement of Online Dispute Resolution discussion list
- From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE
- From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE
- From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-OrientedDescriptions for XML
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE
- From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
RE: [xml-dev] [offtopic] A message from the rebellion.
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects
- From: "Anderson, John" <John@Barbadosoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Sablotron 0.95
- From: Petr Cimprich <petr@gingerall.cz>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-OrientedDescriptions for XML
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
[ANN] VLDB-EEXTT Call for Participation and Program
- From: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@yahoo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly lessverbose (andeasier to author) XML)
- From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@mozquito.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly lessverbose (andeasier to author) XML)
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly lessverbose (andeasier to author) XML)
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (andeasier to author) XML)
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (andeasier to author) XML)
- From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
[offtopic] A message from the rebellion.
- From: "Garland foster" <garland_foster@salutia.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-OrientedDescriptions for XML
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (andeasier to author) XML)
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: "Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@wyeast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: Doug Ransom <Doug.Ransom@pwrm.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
- From: Doug Ransom <Doug.Ransom@pwrm.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: Doug Ransom <Doug.Ransom@pwrm.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML
- From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: "Anderson, John" <John@Barbadosoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML
- From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Java - XMLReader and SAX Filters
- From: "Filipe Correia" <filipe.correia@paradigmaxis.pt>
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Java - XMLReader and SAX Filters
- From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@ingenta.com>
[ANN] RelaxNGCC Ver.1.0
- From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@kohsuke.org>
Java - XMLReader and SAX Filters
- From: "Filipe Correia" <filipe.correia@paradigmaxis.pt>
Objects vs. XML aka LISP and How History Repeats Itself
- From: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@yahoo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] on the subject of schema crunching...
- From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] help - Writing schema
- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
help - Writing schema
- From: "pradeep bhat" <pradeepbhat@slk-soft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Representing interdependence of elements within a schema or dtd
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Second edition of XML in a Nutshell published
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Intuition and XML Schema restriction (was: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt)
- From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration using DOM
- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
XML Startkabel updates
- From: "xml startkabel" <xml@planet.nl>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration using DOM
- From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
- From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: Robin LaFontaine <robin.lafontaine@deltaxml.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
- From: "McNally, David" <David.McNally@moodys.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Second edition of XML in a Nutshell published
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration using DOM
- From: Christian Nentwich <c.nentwich@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Representing interdependence of elements within a schema or dtd
- From: "John Rivett-Carnac" <jbrc@chorusconsulting.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier toauthor) XML
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] schema management for a document pipeline: requestfor comment
- From: Robin LaFontaine <robin.lafontaine@deltaxml.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
- From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Updated on 6
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
- From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Logical markup Language
- From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>
Namespace declaration using DOM
- From: "pradeep bhat" <pradeepbhat@slk-soft.com>
Namespace declaration using DOM
- From: "pradeep bhat" <pradeepbhat@slk-soft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "Don Box" <dbox@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "James Clark" <jjc@jclark.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easiertoauthor) XML
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier toauthor) XML
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "Don Box" <dbox@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Logical markup Language
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
- From: "Don Box" <dbox@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] on the subject of schema crunching...
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@allette.com.au>
Updated on 6
- From: ndw <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
- From: Steve Ball <Steve.Ball@zveno.com>
Logical markup Language
- From: "Trevor Croll" <trevorcroll@fastmail.fm>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] on the subject of schema crunching...
- From: "Paul Brown" <prb@fivesight.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] on the subject of schema crunching...
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
on the subject of schema crunching...
- From: "Paul Brown" <prb@fivesight.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
- From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
RE: [xml-dev] RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@kohsuke.org>
RE: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: "Ramin Firoozye" <ramin@wizen.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@kohsuke.org>
Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@catcode.com>
Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@yahoo.com>
RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@kohsuke.org>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Jason Diamond" <jason@injektilo.org>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@wyeast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: walter kriha <walter@kriha.de>
[off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: Steven Noels <stevenn@outerthought.org>
RE: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: "Michael Leditschke" <mike@ammd.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
xmlschemata.org (was: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt)
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
RE: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
[off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: Steven Noels <stevenn@outerthought.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@wyeast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@wyeast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Murali Mani <mani@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@catcode.com>
RE: [xml-dev] stopping XML (was RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects)
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
stopping XML (was RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects)
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Brothers, Michael (IA)" <Michael.Brothers@ia.ngb.army.mil>
Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Relax NG Projects
- From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@catcode.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
How to Unsubscribe
- From: Bing.Li@asu.edu
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "John Evdemon" <jevdemon@acm.org>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
XML Schema to relaxNG xslt
- From: Rick Taylor <taylor@ppdm.org>
RE: [xml-dev] Relax Lexical vs XML Lexical structure
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Relax Lexical vs XML Lexical structure
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Relax Lexical vs XML Lexical structure
- From: Doug Ransom <Doug.Ransom@pwrm.com>
Re: [xml-dev] What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned?(WAS RE: [ xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema)
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned? (WAS RE: [ xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema)
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: [xml-dev] Ann: Schemachine (a pipelined Xml validationframework)
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character
- From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
xvif: not for schemas only
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
xvif: fallback mechanism
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
(location.pathname.substring(0,6)
- From: robin <robin@isogen.com>
Extreme Markup Languages Program Now Available...Join other XML-Dev participants in Montreal
- From: "Elledge, Marion" <MElledge@idealliance.org>
A high-speed non-validating parser
- From: Matt Fausey <fausey@chilkatsoft.com>
Ann: Schemachine (a pipelined Xml validation framework)
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Format Output
- From: Nguyen La Yen Dung <dungnly@sdcgrp.com>
Re: XML to DTD Converter
- From: <trasverso@katamail.com>
Ann: Xml Validation Interoperability Framework (xvif)
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Question
- From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
Re: [xml-dev] What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema)
- From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Question
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Question
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned?(WAS RE: [ xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema)
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] SAX Question
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Xerces-C++ and std::string
- From: "Corey A. Spitzer" <cspitzer@cisco.com>
SAX Question
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] New presentation about XML Schema Datatypes
- From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
OASIS TC Call For Participation: Automotive Repair Information TC
- From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org>
What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema)
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
OASIS TC Call For Participation: Management Protocol TC
- From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] Software Integration Markup Language?
- From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
Software Integration Markup Language?
- From: Gustaf Liljegren <gustaf.liljegren@xml.se>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: Paul Spencer <paul@alphaxml.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character
- From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@excelbus.com>
Re: [xml-dev] ANNOUNCE: Stylus Studio 4.0 Now Available -- Free
- From: Danny Vint <dvint@mindspring.com>
ANNOUNCE: Stylus Studio 4.0 Now Available -- Free
- From: Adam Abrevaya <adama@exln.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XUL available application, examples, demo. development?
- From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XUL available application, examples, demo. development?
- From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@mozquito.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: "Anderson, John" <John@Barbadosoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
[ANN] Update of Topologi Schematron Validator adds RELAX NG
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] New presentation about XML Schema Datatypes
- From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: "Anderson, John" <John@Barbadosoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
RE: [xml-dev] XUL available application, examples, demo. development?
- From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
Re: [xml-dev] simple and easiest method to input data thro telephone
- From: Peter Davis <peter@pdavis.cx>
Re: [xml-dev] simple and easiest method to input data thro telephone
- From: "raghavendran" <raghavendran@maruthi.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces and DTDs - Why not use what we have?
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] XUL available application, examples, demo. development?
- From: "Trevor Croll" <trevorcroll@fastmail.fm>
RE: [xml-dev] XUL available application, examples, demo. development?
- From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@mozquito.com>
XUL available application, examples, demo. development?
- From: "Trevor Croll" <trevorcroll@fastmail.fm>
Updated Unicode presentation from XML 2001
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
New presentation about XML Schema Datatypes
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
ANNOUNCE: RDF Gateway v0.9.5 Released
- From: "Derrish Repchick" <dman@sover.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character
- From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@sosnoski.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character
- From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@excelbus.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character
- From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@sosnoski.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed
- From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@sosnoski.com>
Parse Error - Invalid Character
- From: "Karl Stubsjoen" <karl@excelbus.com>
RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL?
- From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@cardiff.com>
RE: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: DSDL: use
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
- From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Python implementation of Regular Fragmentations and online demo
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
OASIS announcement of edXML discussion list
- From: "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org>
ANN: Python implementation of Regular Fragmentations and online demo
- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Best Practice - beyond schema
- From: "Paul Spencer" <paul@alphaxml.com>
RE: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility
- From: kundan.upadhyay@kodak.com
RE: XML Infoset vs XML Tagged Text
- From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Namespaces and DTDs - Why not use what we have?
- From: "Anderson, John" <John@Barbadosoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
RE: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
- From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
- From: Mike Brown <mike@skew.org>
RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL?
- From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL?
- From: "SHARPE, Ian" <Ian.SHARPE@cambridge.sema.slb.com>
RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL?
- From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL?
- From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
RE: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
- From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL?
- From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL?
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL?
- From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL?
- From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
User interface programming XUL?
- From: "Trevor Croll" <trevorcroll@fastmail.fm>
Re: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
XML to DTD Converter
- From: Mustafa Hilal Qureshi <mustafa_hilal@yahoo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not neededas part of DTD syntax?
- From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@sosnoski.com>
Why validate? What kind of validation?
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] XML Documents Complexity
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
XUL Fool?
- From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not neededas part of DTD syntax?
- From: Dennis Sosnoski <dms@sosnoski.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Documents Complexity
- From: "Jimmy Cerra" <jc2astro@hotmail.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: DSDL: usecases: namespace
- From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL:use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
XML Documents Complexity
- From: Mustafa Hilal Qureshi <mustafa_hilal@yahoo.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility
- From: Elena Litani <elitani@ca.ibm.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre <dalapeyre@mulberrytech.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Validate with schemas
- From: Jeffrey Lomas <jeff.lomas@oasis-open.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Validate with schemas
- From: "Stan" <StanD@standyck.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev]DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Validate with schemas
- From: Elena Litani <elitani@ca.ibm.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Validate with schemas
- From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG)" <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Tommorrow, June 15th, Deadline for Call for Presentation for XML
- From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
[ANN] New SAX 2.0 Parser for C++
- From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Tommorrow, June 15th, Deadline for Call for Presentation for XML
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
RE: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Tommorrow, June 15th, Deadline for Call for Presentation for XML 2002 Conference
- From: "Elledge, Marion" <MElledge@idealliance.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
Validate with schemas
- From: Sergio <sergio@corecanarias.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Marcus Carr <mcarr@allette.com.au>
DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
Re: [xml-dev] validation and typechecking
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
validation and typechecking
- From: olivier.dameron@gmx.net
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@earthlink.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Marcus Carr <mcarr@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile
- From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@earthlink.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [dsdl-comment] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Marcus Carr <mcarr@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Marcus Carr <mcarr@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Michael Fuller <msf@mds.rmit.edu.au>
Re: [xml-dev] MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility
- From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility
- From: kundan.upadhyay@kodak.com
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Arjun Ray <aray@nyct.net>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@earthlink.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitableand You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
- From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
- From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
CLaRK System - an XML-based System for Corpora Development
- From: "Milen Kouylekov" <mkouylekov@dir.bg>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
dtd, schema vs RDF
- From: olivier.dameron@gmx.net
Lightning Talks at Open Source Conference
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Are there any tools that do some DTD introspection?
- From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@attbi.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back
- From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@ingenta.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: Alaric Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
RE: [xml-dev] Error in a Class Cast
- From: "Patrick Lehti" <lehti@ipsi.fhg.de>
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
- From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
Re: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back
- From: "Don Park" <donpark@docuverse.com>
RE: [xml-dev] XML Conformance Test Suite at W3C
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
XML Conformance Test Suite at W3C
- From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
Re: [xml-dev] When do tags stop being a good idea?
- From: Marcus Carr <mcarr@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: "Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@wyeast.net>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
- From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: John F Schlesinger <johns@syscore.com>
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
Re: [xml-dev] When do tags stop being a good idea?
- From: Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre <dalapeyre@mulberrytech.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] <xsd:all> problem
- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Re: [xml-dev] <xsd:all> problem
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
SOAP, XSD, and HTTP
- From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
<xsd:all> problem
- From: PeterHowells@halifax.co.uk
Error in a Class Cast
- From: João Sarraipa <jfss@uninova.pt>
RE: [xml-dev] Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back
- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Re: Malicious documents?
- From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ...
- From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ...
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ...
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ...
- From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc
- From: "P.J. Schwartz" <peej@mindspring.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab le and You Mig ht As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] When do tags stop being a good idea?
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Mig ht As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
- From: "Anderson, John" <John@Barbadosoft.com>
call for presentations
- From: Paul Hermans <paul_hermans@protext.be>
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
RE: [xml-dev] When do tags stop being a good idea?
- From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
RE: [xml-dev] When do tags stop being a good idea?
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Re: [xml-dev] When do tags stop being a good idea?
- From: bob mcwhirter <bob@werken.com>
When do tags stop being a good idea?
- From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@xampl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ...
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ...
- From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition
- From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "bryan" <bry@itnisk.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] dates (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box)
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Marcus Carr <mcarr@allette.com.au>
How to unsubscribe (was Re: something else)
- From: Mike Brown <mike@skew.org>
Best Mailing List for Web Services?
- From: Kakade Mangesh <Mangesh.Kakade@sisl.co.in>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] RealSystem ML File
- From: Kakade Mangesh <Mangesh.Kakade@sisl.co.in>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
[off-topic] For-pay APIs
- From: "Ramin Firoozye" <ramin@wizen.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition
- From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
Re: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] dates (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box)
- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] dates (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box)
- From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@alumni.princeton.edu>
Re: [xml-dev] dates (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance isFutile, says Don Box)
- From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition
- From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@develop.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML syntax for XPath
- From: <lakshmi@cs.utep.edu>
RE: [xml-dev] dates (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box)
- From: "Allen, David J." <DAVID.ALLEN@northropgrumman.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML syntax for XPath
- From: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@hotmail.com>
Re: [xml-dev] dates (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile,
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
dates (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box)
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition
- From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@earthlink.net>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
RE: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc
- From: Xan Gregg <xan@tibco.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] XML syntax for XPath
- From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
RE: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
RealSystem ML File
- From: jjc <jjc@jclark.com>
RE: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
Re: