xml-dev

← back

924 messages · 248 threads

# Subject From Date
00022 Re: [xml-dev] Visualizing data - www.kartoo.com John Evdemon 2002-06-01 07:16
00017 XML Standards Library 1.0 : Updated 1 June 2002 MWS Tech Support 2002-06-01 13:35
00007 Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-01 13:42
00008 W3C XML Schema errata updated, also schema document for schemas [email protected] 2002-06-01 22:02
00021 Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-02 14:16
00018 Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-02 14:55
00019 More Patent Follies? Mike Champion 2002-06-02 18:12
00020 Re: [xml-dev] More Patent Follies? Bjoern Hoehrmann 2002-06-02 18:48
00009 Re: [xml-dev] More Patent Follies? Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-02 19:04
00006 Re: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back!It's a trap! Paul Prescod 2002-06-02 19:38
00010 Re: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! Paul Prescod 2002-06-02 19:49
00005 RE: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-02 20:09
00016 Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements Rob Lugt 2002-06-02 20:14
00011 Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements Rob Lugt 2002-06-02 20:20
00002 Re: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! Rich Salz 2002-06-02 20:26
00003 Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-02 20:36
00004 Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements Rob Lugt 2002-06-02 21:18
00001 Proposal (was Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements) Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-02 21:25
00012 RE: [xml-dev] Question regarding PSVI.. Murali Mani 2002-06-02 21:45
00015 Re: [xml-dev] SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified Richard Tobin 2002-06-02 22:47
00013 Re: [xml-dev] RE: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements Ronald Bourret 2002-06-03 06:49
00014 Re: [xml-dev] Proposal (was Re: [Sax-devel] Re: SAX survey: expected localname for non-namespace qualified elements) Ronald Bourret 2002-06-03 06:56
00075 doc2xml Alexey N. Shananin 2002-06-06 09:00
00089 RE: [xml-dev] doc2xml Manos Batsis 2002-06-06 09:06
00046 ANNOUNCEMENT: Castor 0.9.3.19 has been released Arnaud Blandin 2002-06-06 09:28
00031 RE: [xml-dev] doc2xml Manos Batsis 2002-06-06 09:30
00032 RE: [xml-dev] doc2xml Steven Noels 2002-06-06 09:44
00045 Is there any way for converting word perfect files .wpd to xml fi les????? SysGrad 2002-06-06 13:04
00090 Re: [xml-dev] Is there any way for converting word perfect files .wpd to xml fi les????? Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-06 13:33
00073 Deadline for XML 2002 Call for Papers, June 15th Elledge, Marion 2002-06-06 14:03
00088 Re: [xml-dev] Why datatypes? Arjun Ray 2002-06-06 14:09
00077 schema management for a document pipeline: request for comment DuCharme, Bob (LNG) 2002-06-06 14:15
00062 ANN: Persian - C++ Web Services Platform David Noor 2002-06-06 15:28
00050 Building Complex XML Nischal Muthana 2002-06-06 17:07
00110 Re: [xml-dev] schema management for a document pipeline: request for comment Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-06 17:53
00119 RE: [xml-dev] Building Complex XML Michael Kay 2002-06-06 18:23
00120 RE: [xml-dev] Building Complex XML Nischal Muthana 2002-06-06 18:38
00109 RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG-related tools (was: Interesting mailing li st ...) DuCharme, Bob (LNG) 2002-06-06 19:23
00052 RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG-related tools (was: Interesting mailing li st ...) John Evdemon 2002-06-06 19:36
00061 RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG-related tools (was: Interesting mailing li st ...) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-06 19:43
00048 RE: [xml-dev] RELAX NG-related tools (was: Interesting mailing li st ...) Murali Mani 2002-06-06 20:07
00047 Re: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist? Paul Prescod 2002-06-06 21:22
00063 RE: [xml-dev] Building Complex XML Michael Kay 2002-06-06 21:23
00065 sharing dom on Virtual machines [email protected] 2002-06-06 21:36
00121 Re: [xml-dev] sharing dom on Virtual machines [email protected] 2002-06-06 21:39
00108 Re: [xml-dev] Is there any way for converting word perfect files .wpd to xml fi les????? [email protected] 2002-06-06 21:49
00107 Re: [xml-dev] Is there any way for converting word perfect files .wpd to xml fi les????? Betty Harvey 2002-06-06 21:56
00064 Re: [xml-dev] sharing dom on Virtual machines Peter V. Mikhalenko 2002-06-06 22:29
00049 Re: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist? Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-06 22:40
00122 Re: RE: [xml-dev] Building Complex XML Eric Bohlman 2002-06-06 22:53
00051 XForms processors generalized API [proposal] Peter V. Mikhalenko 2002-06-06 23:10
00060 Re: [xml-dev] Why datatypes? Eric Bohlman 2002-06-06 23:10
00086 schemas, communities Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-07 00:50
00078 Re: [xml-dev] schema management for a document pipeline: request for comment Eddie Robertsson 2002-06-07 01:19
00044 Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer gkholman 2002-06-07 04:16
00033 Re: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist? Uche Ogbuji 2002-06-07 05:07
00043 RE: [xml-dev] Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer Alex Brown 2002-06-07 08:35
00076 Re: [xml-dev] Parsing XML & JSP problems Ronald Bourret 2002-06-07 08:38
00034 RE: [xml-dev] Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer Manos Batsis 2002-06-07 08:39
00074 SourceForge and Zvon RFC Repository Miloslav Nic 2002-06-07 08:44
00087 Re: [xml-dev] Parsing XML & JSP problems Ronald Bourret 2002-06-07 08:45
00091 How to declare a int variable in XSL Mohamed Raffi 2002-06-07 09:31
00116 Re: [xml-dev] How to declare a int variable in XSL David Carlisle 2002-06-07 09:45
00101 RE: [xml-dev] How to declare a int variable in XSL Manos Batsis 2002-06-07 09:53
00053 XML-Development questions (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] How to declare a int variable in XSL) Manos Batsis 2002-06-07 09:58
00071 RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside Anderson, John 2002-06-07 11:52
00070 Re: [xml-dev] SourceForge and Zvon RFC Repository Rich Salz 2002-06-07 12:16
00055 Strategies for editing large documents Jeff Rafter 2002-06-07 12:33
00099 RE: [xml-dev] XML-Development questions (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] How t o declare a int variable in XSL) Long, Craig Z 2002-06-07 12:34
00117 Re: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist? Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-07 12:58
00104 RE: [xml-dev] XML-Development questions (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] How to declare a int variable in XSL) Manos Batsis 2002-06-07 13:12
00115 Re: [xml-dev] How to declare a int variable in XSL Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-07 13:22
00028 Re: [xml-dev] Strategies for editing large documents Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-07 13:26
00037 RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-07 13:28
00093 Re: [xml-dev] How to declare a int variable in XSL David Carlisle 2002-06-07 13:35
00085 RE: [xml-dev] How to declare a int variable in XSL Manos Batsis 2002-06-07 13:39
00083 W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Mike Champion 2002-06-07 13:39
00094 Re: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside John Cowan 2002-06-07 13:43
00036 XSLT and XML Schema (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) Manos Batsis 2002-06-07 13:48
00030 RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-07 13:57
00038 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-07 13:59
00025 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box John Cowan 2002-06-07 14:04
00042 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box [email protected] 2002-06-07 14:12
00027 Re: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist? Uche Ogbuji 2002-06-07 14:15
00023 Borrowed email address for virus G. Ken Holman 2002-06-07 14:20
00112 Re: [xml-dev] XSLT and XML Schema (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) Uche Ogbuji 2002-06-07 14:21
00081 Constitutionally incapable (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-07 14:22
00096 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-07 14:29
00097 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-07 14:31
00080 Re: [xml-dev] How to declare a int variable in XSL Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-07 14:41
00039 RE: [xml-dev] XSLT and XML Schema (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-07 14:47
00029 Re: [xml-dev] Constitutionally incapable (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) [email protected] 2002-06-07 14:48
00035 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box [email protected] 2002-06-07 14:49
00069 RE: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist? Bill de hÓra 2002-06-07 14:50
00105 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-07 14:51
00056 Re: [xml-dev] Constitutionally incapable (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-07 14:56
00059 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-07 14:59
00066 Re: [xml-dev] Constitutionally incapable (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-07 15:06
00113 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box John Cowan 2002-06-07 15:25
00103 Re: [xml-dev] Borrowed email address for virus John Cowan 2002-06-07 15:29
00118 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Mike Champion 2002-06-07 15:32
00100 Re: [xml-dev] Constitutionally incapable (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) John Cowan 2002-06-07 15:35
00058 Are there any tools that do some DTD introspection? Daniel Shane 2002-06-07 15:37
00067 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Rich Salz 2002-06-07 15:51
00114 Re: [xml-dev] Are there any tools that do some DTD introspection? Mike Champion 2002-06-07 15:59
00102 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-07 16:02
00106 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Paul Prescod 2002-06-07 16:21
00111 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-07 16:23
00068 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Rich Salz 2002-06-07 16:36
00057 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-07 16:37
00072 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Paul Prescod 2002-06-07 16:47
00054 xsi:type and broken contracts [email protected] 2002-06-07 16:54
00082 Re: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist? Paul Prescod 2002-06-07 16:54
00098 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-07 17:13
00079 Re: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist? Paul Prescod 2002-06-07 17:14
00040 Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts Jeni Tennison 2002-06-07 17:21
00026 Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts Jeff Rafter 2002-06-07 17:24
00041 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Mike Champion 2002-06-07 17:28
00024 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Rich Salz 2002-06-07 17:35
00095 RE: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist? Bill de hÓra 2002-06-07 17:46
00084 RE: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-07 17:52
00092 RE: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist? Bill de hÓra 2002-06-07 17:55
00175 Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts Jeff Rafter 2002-06-07 18:17
00189 Xml/xpath/xslt Adam Chang 2002-06-07 18:40
00146 JMS OR SOAP [email protected] 2002-06-07 19:43
00131 Evangelizing RNG Don Park 2002-06-07 20:24
00132 Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts [email protected] 2002-06-07 20:59
00145 Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts [email protected] 2002-06-07 21:03
00190 Re: [xml-dev] Xml/xpath/xslt Mike Brown 2002-06-07 21:13
00173 Re: [xml-dev] Xml/xpath/xslt Ronald Bourret 2002-06-07 21:31
00188 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Murali Mani 2002-06-07 21:39
00177 Re: [xml-dev] Xml/xpath/xslt bob mcwhirter 2002-06-07 22:15
00162 Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts Paul Prescod 2002-06-07 22:35
00150 RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-08 02:59
00210 RE: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-08 03:09
00219 RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside James Clark 2002-06-08 03:34
00220 RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-08 03:40
00209 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Seairth Jacobs 2002-06-08 04:41
00152 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-08 06:19
00161 Re: [xml-dev] JMS OR SOAP Ronald Bourret 2002-06-08 06:59
00148 Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Miles Sabin 2002-06-08 08:37
00163 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-08 09:01
00147 RE: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts Michael Leditschke 2002-06-08 09:11
00165 RE: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Bill de hÓra 2002-06-08 09:12
00221 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-08 09:43
00208 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Miles Sabin 2002-06-08 09:44
00207 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-08 10:03
00222 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Miles Sabin 2002-06-08 10:13
00164 Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts [email protected] 2002-06-08 10:15
00149 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Miles Sabin 2002-06-08 10:24
00160 RE: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-08 10:47
00151 Re: Constitutionally incapable (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) MURATA Makoto 2002-06-08 13:30
00186 RE: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts Michael Leditschke 2002-06-08 14:09
00178 RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside Michael Leditschke 2002-06-08 14:19
00133 Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts Paul Prescod 2002-06-08 14:28
00144 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box bryan 2002-06-08 15:19
00143 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-08 15:34
00134 Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts [email protected] 2002-06-08 18:15
00176 Re: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside [email protected] 2002-06-08 18:52
00187 RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-08 19:11
00174 Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts Paul Prescod 2002-06-08 19:29
00191 Re: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside Paul Prescod 2002-06-08 19:32
00216 RE: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-08 19:39
00153 Actually, resistance is proving far from futile Uche Ogbuji 2002-06-08 19:42
00201 Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts Jeff Rafter 2002-06-08 20:17
00171 Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts [email protected] 2002-06-08 20:34
00170 New version of XSV up on the web, somewhat experimental [email protected] 2002-06-08 22:15
00155 Re: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist? Uche Ogbuji 2002-06-08 23:12
00199 Re: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist? Uche Ogbuji 2002-06-08 23:16
00217 Re: Actually, resistance is proving far from futile Rich Salz 2002-06-09 00:14
00204 Re: Actually, resistance is proving far from futile Rich Salz 2002-06-09 00:16
00215 RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside Michael Leditschke 2002-06-09 00:35
00128 embedding xml schema in an instance doc [email protected] 2002-06-09 05:37
00137 RE: [xml-dev] embedding xml schema in an instance doc Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-09 08:52
00193 RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside James Clark 2002-06-09 10:08
00185 RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside James Clark 2002-06-09 10:30
00183 Formatting XML Sebastian A. 2002-06-09 15:21
00194 RE: [xml-dev] Formatting XML Michael Kay 2002-06-09 15:52
00136 RE: [xml-dev] Formatting XML Mike Champion 2002-06-09 16:03
00130 Re: [xml-dev] Formatting XML [email protected] 2002-06-09 16:24
00138 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Ronald Bourret 2002-06-10 07:44
00125 How to find out the name of the tag where my xmldocument did not validate Peter Magnusson 2002-06-10 08:07
00142 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Rob Lugt 2002-06-10 08:52
00196 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Miles Sabin 2002-06-10 09:07
00123 Re: [xml-dev] Evangelizing RNG Norman Gray 2002-06-10 10:25
00181 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Francis Norton 2002-06-10 10:59
00197 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Miles Sabin 2002-06-10 11:16
00180 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Rob Lugt 2002-06-10 11:39
00127 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Rob Lugt 2002-06-10 11:42
00139 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Miles Sabin 2002-06-10 11:52
00129 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Rob Lugt 2002-06-10 12:24
00135 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-10 13:33
00205 Re: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside W. E. Perry 2002-06-10 13:38
00212 RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-10 13:55
00169 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Miles Sabin 2002-06-10 14:12
00159 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 14:30
00166 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 14:31
00213 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 14:32
00156 RE: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Michael Kay 2002-06-10 14:32
00203 RE: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Michael Kay 2002-06-10 14:38
00200 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-10 14:43
00218 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-10 14:44
00158 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 15:01
00167 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Miles Sabin 2002-06-10 15:10
00214 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 15:15
00202 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Miles Sabin 2002-06-10 15:20
00206 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-10 15:23
00211 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-10 15:34
00168 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box David Carlisle 2002-06-10 15:34
00157 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Tim Bray 2002-06-10 15:43
00273 Re: xml-dev Digest 10 Jun 2002 15:30:40 -0000 Issue 339 VendrEDI 2002-06-10 15:50
00172 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-10 15:54
00154 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box John Cowan 2002-06-10 16:09
00198 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 16:21
00179 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 16:25
00126 Re: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Mike Champion 2002-06-10 16:31
00140 Re: [xml-dev] Borrowed email address for virus monty solomon 2002-06-10 16:44
00124 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Matt Gushee 2002-06-10 16:49
00141 experts (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-10 16:49
00182 RE: [xml-dev] experts (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-10 16:52
00195 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Matt Gushee 2002-06-10 16:56
00184 Re: [xml-dev] experts (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, saysDon Box) W. E. Perry 2002-06-10 17:07
00192 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-10 17:12
00275 Re: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Mike Champion 2002-06-10 17:15
00289 Re: [xml-dev] experts (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, saysDon Box) Paul Prescod 2002-06-10 17:19
00246 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bill de hÓra 2002-06-10 17:19
00231 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-10 17:27
00232 RE: [xml-dev] experts (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Fu tile, saysDon Box) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-10 17:41
00290 XML syntax for XPath [email protected] 2002-06-10 17:47
00245 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box [email protected] 2002-06-10 17:49
00288 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Paul Prescod 2002-06-10 17:54
00277 RE: [xml-dev] experts (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 17:54
00262 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box John Cowan 2002-06-10 17:57
00250 remembering Orlando Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-10 18:02
00310 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Arjun Ray 2002-06-10 18:06
00319 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 18:10
00320 RE: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 18:26
00309 RE: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-10 18:34
00252 (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc [email protected] 2002-06-10 18:35
00248 RE: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-10 18:45
00261 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Tim Bray 2002-06-10 18:45
00263 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Arjun Ray 2002-06-10 18:53
00247 ANN: update to XSLToolbox Josh Lubell 2002-06-10 18:57
00321 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Michael Kay 2002-06-10 19:09
00265 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Fredrik Lindgren 2002-06-10 19:10
00308 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Paul Prescod 2002-06-10 19:13
00322 RE: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 19:14
00307 RE: [xml-dev] XML syntax for XPath Michael Kay 2002-06-10 19:15
00264 RE: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-10 19:17
00249 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 19:19
00260 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Paul Prescod 2002-06-10 19:29
00251 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 19:38
00286 RE: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-10 19:40
00278 Re: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc [email protected] 2002-06-10 19:40
00233 RE: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-10 19:46
00244 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 19:50
00243 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Tim Bray 2002-06-10 20:00
00234 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Paul Prescod 2002-06-10 20:07
00276 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Jim Ancona 2002-06-10 20:12
00287 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Jason Diamond 2002-06-10 20:24
00291 Re: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc [email protected] 2002-06-10 20:27
00274 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Henrik Motakef 2002-06-10 20:30
00316 RE: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-10 20:41
00301 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Joe English 2002-06-10 20:49
00253 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Mike Champion 2002-06-10 20:56
00271 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Joe English 2002-06-10 21:04
00270 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 21:07
00255 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 21:25
00299 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Paul Prescod 2002-06-10 21:58
00317 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Alaric Snell 2002-06-10 22:16
00304 RE: [xml-dev] Xml/xpath/xslt Adam Chang 2002-06-10 22:45
00315 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-10 22:49
00228 RE: [xml-dev] Xml/xpath/xslt Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-11 00:09
00237 Re: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc Eddie Robertsson 2002-06-11 00:39
00293 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Jim Ancona 2002-06-11 01:15
00285 XMLSerializer Mohamed Raffi 2002-06-11 01:35
00283 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Amelia A Lewis 2002-06-11 02:35
00294 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-11 02:37
00236 Re: [xml-dev] XML syntax for XPath Michael Dyck 2002-06-11 02:43
00230 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-11 02:43
00225 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Jason Diamond 2002-06-11 02:59
00238 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Eddie Robertsson 2002-06-11 03:01
00242 Pretty good interview with GM CTO Scott Tim Bray 2002-06-11 03:48
00223 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Amelia A Lewis 2002-06-11 03:57
00281 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-11 04:07
00296 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Rich Salz 2002-06-11 04:12
00297 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Simon Fell 2002-06-11 04:16
00280 RE: [xml-dev] Borrowed email address for virus Kakade Mangesh 2002-06-11 04:28
00227 Keys versus links (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-11 04:43
00239 How to change structure for XML file? Nguyen La Yen Dung 2002-06-11 06:10
00229 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-11 06:28
00235 Re: [xml-dev] How to change structure for XML file? Matt Gushee 2002-06-11 06:30
00312 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box James Clark 2002-06-11 06:34
00305 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-11 06:35
00269 RE: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Michael Kay 2002-06-11 07:10
00256 RE: [xml-dev] XML syntax for XPath Manos Batsis 2002-06-11 07:52
00259 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box bryan 2002-06-11 08:40
00266 publish vxml @ xml Haszeli 2002-06-11 09:59
00313 Re: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc [email protected] 2002-06-11 10:17
00303 Re: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc [email protected] 2002-06-11 10:22
00318 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Daniel Veillard 2002-06-11 12:25
00258 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bill de hÓra 2002-06-11 12:40
00300 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bill de hÓra 2002-06-11 12:40
00267 Data binding as type definition Amelia A Lewis 2002-06-11 12:46
00314 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-11 12:47
00302 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Matt Gushee 2002-06-11 13:02
00306 RE: [xml-dev] Pretty good interview with GM CTO Scott Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-11 13:13
00311 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Mark Seaborne 2002-06-11 13:18
00268 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-11 13:36
00257 Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition John Cowan 2002-06-11 14:10
00272 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box bryan 2002-06-11 14:25
00298 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box bryan 2002-06-11 14:40
00254 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-11 14:44
00279 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-11 14:47
00226 Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition [email protected] 2002-06-11 14:52
00240 Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) Miles Sabin 2002-06-11 15:06
00241 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Mike Champion 2002-06-11 15:06
00224 New datatyping (was Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition) Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-11 15:15
00282 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box bryan 2002-06-11 15:16
00295 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-11 15:20
00284 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Matt Gushee 2002-06-11 15:28
00292 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Paul Prescod 2002-06-11 15:30
00375 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box W. E. Perry 2002-06-12 12:39
00346 Re: [xml-dev] So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ... John Cowan 2002-06-12 13:18
00331 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 John Cowan 2002-06-12 13:20
00389 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-12 13:28
00332 When do tags stop being a good idea? Bob Hutchison 2002-06-12 13:46
00345 Re: [xml-dev] When do tags stop being a good idea? bob mcwhirter 2002-06-12 13:51
00390 Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Mig ht As Well Get Paid for Implementing It Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-12 13:54
00373 RE: [xml-dev] When do tags stop being a good idea? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-12 13:57
00388 RE: [xml-dev] When do tags stop being a good idea? Manos Batsis 2002-06-12 13:58
00362 call for presentations Paul Hermans 2002-06-12 13:59
00377 RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab le and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-12 14:07
00350 RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab le and You Mig ht As Well Get Paid for Implementing It Anderson, John 2002-06-12 14:16
00419 RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab le and You Mig ht As Well Get Paid for Implementing It Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-12 14:20
00409 Re: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc P.J. Schwartz 2002-06-12 14:25
00420 Re: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab John Cowan 2002-06-12 14:25
00352 Re: [xml-dev] So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ... Mike Champion 2002-06-12 14:27
00361 RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-12 14:28
00348 RE: [xml-dev] So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ... Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-12 14:31
00410 Re: [xml-dev] When do tags stop being a good idea? Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-12 14:33
00347 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box John Cowan 2002-06-12 14:40
00363 RE: [xml-dev] So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ... Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-12 14:41
00365 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bill de hÓra 2002-06-12 14:41
00421 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bill de hÓra 2002-06-12 15:13
00407 Re: [xml-dev] So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ... Francis Norton 2002-06-12 15:57
00408 Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back Tim Bray 2002-06-12 15:59
00422 RE: [xml-dev] Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-12 16:23
00364 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Paul Prescod 2002-06-12 16:29
00349 Re: Malicious documents? Richard Tobin 2002-06-12 16:31
00360 RE: [xml-dev] Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back Bill de hÓra 2002-06-12 16:32
00351 Error in a Class Cast João Sarraipa 2002-06-12 16:35
00386 <xsd:all> problem [email protected] 2002-06-12 16:40
00378 SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Mike Champion 2002-06-12 16:47
00333 Re: [xml-dev] <xsd:all> problem John Cowan 2002-06-12 16:52
00344 RE: [xml-dev] <xsd:all> problem Bill de hÓra 2002-06-12 16:56
00343 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-12 17:00
00334 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Alaric B. Snell 2002-06-12 17:04
00376 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Mike Champion 2002-06-12 17:50
00387 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Mike Champion 2002-06-12 18:01
00374 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-12 18:10
00391 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Rich Salz 2002-06-12 18:14
00416 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Mike Champion 2002-06-12 18:50
00401 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Paul Prescod 2002-06-12 18:57
00371 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Matt Gushee 2002-06-12 19:00
00353 Re: [xml-dev] When do tags stop being a good idea? Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre 2002-06-12 19:03
00370 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Paul Prescod 2002-06-12 19:05
00355 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-12 19:06
00399 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Tim Bray 2002-06-12 19:10
00417 RE: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-12 19:16
00404 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box John F Schlesinger 2002-06-12 20:19
00415 RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It Joshua Allen 2002-06-12 20:56
00328 RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-12 21:02
00337 RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab le and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-12 21:22
00393 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box W. E. Perry 2002-06-12 21:35
00385 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-12 21:47
00383 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box John Cowan 2002-06-12 22:11
00394 RE: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Michael Fitzgerald 2002-06-12 22:30
00336 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Paul Prescod 2002-06-12 22:33
00330 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Paul Prescod 2002-06-12 23:28
00338 Re: [xml-dev] When do tags stop being a good idea? Marcus Carr 2002-06-12 23:32
00335 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Alaric Snell 2002-06-13 00:06
00325 XML Conformance Test Suite at W3C Jeff Rafter 2002-06-13 00:10
00342 RE: [xml-dev] XML Conformance Test Suite at W3C Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-13 00:12
00323 RE: [xml-dev] Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back Don Park 2002-06-13 01:01
00381 RE: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-13 04:42
00380 Re: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-13 04:59
00396 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Ronald Bourret 2002-06-13 06:34
00397 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Ronald Bourret 2002-06-13 06:35
00327 RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It Manos Batsis 2002-06-13 07:16
00339 RE: [xml-dev] Error in a Class Cast Patrick Lehti 2002-06-13 08:19
00329 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Mark Baker 2002-06-13 08:57
00405 RE: [xml-dev] Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back Leigh Dodds 2002-06-13 09:03
00412 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Jonathan Borden 2002-06-13 10:32
00369 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Bob Hutchison 2002-06-13 11:51
00356 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Mike Champion 2002-06-13 12:02
00359 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Ronald Bourret 2002-06-13 12:12
00366 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-13 13:03
00413 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 John Cowan 2002-06-13 13:11
00403 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 John Cowan 2002-06-13 13:15
00418 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Ronald Bourret 2002-06-13 13:24
00400 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 John Cowan 2002-06-13 13:51
00367 RE: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-13 13:59
00358 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Ronald Bourret 2002-06-13 14:00
00414 Re: [xml-dev] Are there any tools that do some DTD introspection? Rob Lugt 2002-06-13 14:11
00402 Lightning Talks at Open Source Conference Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-13 14:13
00406 dtd, schema vs RDF [email protected] 2002-06-13 14:57
00411 DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation james anderson 2002-06-13 15:47
00368 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 james anderson 2002-06-13 16:15
00357 CLaRK System - an XML-based System for Corpora Development Milen Kouylekov 2002-06-13 18:21
00372 RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It Joshua Allen 2002-06-13 19:31
00354 Re: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It Mike Champion 2002-06-13 19:47
00398 RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab le and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-13 19:49
00326 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-13 20:53
00379 Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Eric Bohlman 2002-06-13 21:02
00340 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Arjun Ray 2002-06-13 21:03
00341 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 John Cowan 2002-06-13 21:32
00324 MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility [email protected] 2002-06-13 22:18
00382 Re: [xml-dev] MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility Mike Champion 2002-06-13 22:31
00395 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Michael Fuller 2002-06-13 22:43
00384 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Marcus Carr 2002-06-13 23:06
00392 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Arjun Ray 2002-06-13 23:38
00475 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Marcus Carr 2002-06-14 00:08
00489 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bill de hÓra 2002-06-14 00:13
00446 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Bill de hÓra 2002-06-14 00:26
00431 RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box Aaron Skonnard 2002-06-14 01:03
00432 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-14 01:56
00445 Re: [dsdl-comment] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation John Cowan 2002-06-14 03:41
00490 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Arjun Ray 2002-06-14 03:47
00473 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 John Cowan 2002-06-14 03:54
00488 Re: [xml-dev] Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back Arjun Ray 2002-06-14 04:03
00477 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 John Cowan 2002-06-14 04:11
00462 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Arjun Ray 2002-06-14 04:23
00510 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Arjun Ray 2002-06-14 04:59
00519 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 John Cowan 2002-06-14 05:04
00520 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 John Cowan 2002-06-14 05:18
00450 Re: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile Eric Bohlman 2002-06-14 05:21
00509 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Marcus Carr 2002-06-14 05:29
00461 validation and typechecking [email protected] 2002-06-14 06:54
00448 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Ronald Bourret 2002-06-14 07:05
00452 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Eric Bohlman 2002-06-14 07:17
00463 Re: [xml-dev] validation and typechecking Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-14 07:42
00447 Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation james anderson 2002-06-14 08:06
00521 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Marcus Carr 2002-06-14 08:47
00465 DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-14 08:47
00508 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation Ronald Bourret 2002-06-14 08:52
00507 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Ronald Bourret 2002-06-14 09:06
00522 Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? james anderson 2002-06-14 09:22
00464 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation james anderson 2002-06-14 09:42
00449 Validate with schemas Sergio 2002-06-14 10:05
00460 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation Ronald Bourret 2002-06-14 10:06
00451 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? John Cowan 2002-06-14 10:22
00486 Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation John Cowan 2002-06-14 10:36
00478 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation james anderson 2002-06-14 11:12
00444 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation Ronald Bourret 2002-06-14 11:16
00433 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation james anderson 2002-06-14 11:18
00443 Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation james anderson 2002-06-14 11:27
00434 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation Ronald Bourret 2002-06-14 11:28
00476 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation Ronald Bourret 2002-06-14 11:34
00474 RE: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation Michael Kay 2002-06-14 11:58
00487 Tommorrow, June 15th, Deadline for Call for Presentation for XML 2002 Conference Elledge, Marion 2002-06-14 11:58
00491 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-14 11:58
00516 Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation John Cowan 2002-06-14 12:26
00501 Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace John Cowan 2002-06-14 12:28
00453 RE: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-14 13:25
00470 RE: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-14 13:30
00471 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation james anderson 2002-06-14 13:37
00455 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Arjun Ray 2002-06-14 13:44
00499 Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation james anderson 2002-06-14 14:00
00517 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation David Carlisle 2002-06-14 14:01
00504 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Arjun Ray 2002-06-14 14:04
00515 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? John Cowan 2002-06-14 14:15
00428 Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation james anderson 2002-06-14 15:03
00437 RE: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation Michael Kay 2002-06-14 15:09
00485 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation David Carlisle 2002-06-14 15:19
00493 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation james anderson 2002-06-14 15:21
00430 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Uche Ogbuji 2002-06-14 15:30
00483 RE: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: n amespace declaration notation Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-14 15:32
00436 Re: [xml-dev] Tommorrow, June 15th, Deadline for Call for Presentation for XML John Cowan 2002-06-14 15:39
00494 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? james anderson 2002-06-14 15:47
00425 Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part John Cowan 2002-06-14 15:59
00438 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation james anderson 2002-06-14 16:04
00442 [ANN] New SAX 2.0 Parser for C++ Rob Lugt 2002-06-14 16:14
00423 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation David Carlisle 2002-06-14 16:21
00481 Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP Paul Prescod 2002-06-14 16:24
00496 Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part james anderson 2002-06-14 16:37
00497 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation james anderson 2002-06-14 16:42
00480 Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations John Cowan 2002-06-14 16:49
00427 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation David Carlisle 2002-06-14 16:52
00439 Re: [xml-dev] Tommorrow, June 15th, Deadline for Call for Presentation for XML Lauren Wood 2002-06-14 17:09
00429 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Arjun Ray 2002-06-14 17:16
00435 RE: [xml-dev] Validate with schemas DuCharme, Bob (LNG) 2002-06-14 17:19
00505 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Arjun Ray 2002-06-14 17:35
00512 Re: [xml-dev] Validate with schemas Elena Litani 2002-06-14 17:41
00469 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation Tim Bray 2002-06-14 17:56
00456 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? John Cowan 2002-06-14 18:11
00459 RE: [xml-dev] Validate with schemas Stan 2002-06-14 18:36
00466 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Arjun Ray 2002-06-14 19:10
00503 Re: [xml-dev] Validate with schemas Jeffrey Lomas 2002-06-14 19:16
00513 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 John Cowan 2002-06-14 19:20
00500 Re: [xml-dev] MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility Elena Litani 2002-06-14 19:38
00518 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre 2002-06-14 19:39
00458 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 John Cowan 2002-06-14 20:01
00467 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Arjun Ray 2002-06-14 20:44
00514 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 John Cowan 2002-06-14 20:51
00502 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Arjun Ray 2002-06-14 21:08
00506 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 Arjun Ray 2002-06-14 21:22
00511 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? John Cowan 2002-06-14 21:25
00468 Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 John Cowan 2002-06-14 21:34
00457 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Arjun Ray 2002-06-14 22:05
00472 XML Documents Complexity Mustafa Hilal Qureshi 2002-06-14 23:00
00454 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-15 01:21
00498 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace Bob Hutchison 2002-06-15 03:15
00479 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-15 08:24
00426 RE: [xml-dev] XML Documents Complexity Jimmy Cerra 2002-06-15 18:23
00440 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? G. Ken Holman 2002-06-16 00:14
00441 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Dennis Sosnoski 2002-06-16 02:13
00424 XUL Fool? Don Park 2002-06-16 03:19
00482 Re: [xml-dev] XML Documents Complexity Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-16 05:12
00495 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-16 05:28
00484 Why validate? What kind of validation? Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-16 06:05
00492 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Dennis Sosnoski 2002-06-16 08:30
00575 XML to DTD Converter Mustafa Hilal Qureshi 2002-06-16 18:07
00589 Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-06-16 20:09
00546 Re: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs Tim Bray 2002-06-16 20:28
00531 Re: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-16 20:51
00532 Re: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-06-16 21:44
00545 User interface programming XUL? Trevor Croll 2002-06-16 23:05
00590 RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL? Don Park 2002-06-17 00:12
00573 Re: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL? Matt Gushee 2002-06-17 00:27
00588 Re: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL? Paul Prescod 2002-06-17 00:56
00562 RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL? Don Park 2002-06-17 01:14
00577 RE: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-17 01:16
00550 Re: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs Tim Bray 2002-06-17 05:50
00610 RE: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs Julian Reschke 2002-06-17 06:48
00619 RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL? Manos Batsis 2002-06-17 07:23
00620 RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL? Manos Batsis 2002-06-17 07:27
00609 RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL? SHARPE, Ian 2002-06-17 07:47
00552 RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL? Manos Batsis 2002-06-17 07:53
00561 Re: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs Mike Brown 2002-06-17 07:56
00548 RE: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs Julian Reschke 2002-06-17 08:00
00563 RE: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-06-17 10:54
00547 Namespaces and DTDs - Why not use what we have? Anderson, John 2002-06-17 11:39
00565 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed John Cowan 2002-06-17 12:45
00621 RE: XML Infoset vs XML Tagged Text Manos Batsis 2002-06-17 13:15
00608 Re: [xml-dev] MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility [email protected] 2002-06-17 13:22
00607 RE: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-17 13:33
00622 Best Practice - beyond schema Paul Spencer 2002-06-17 14:01
00564 RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-17 14:24
00549 RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-17 14:38
00560 RE: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-17 14:41
00551 ANN: Python implementation of Regular Fragmentations and online demo Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-17 14:57
00586 OASIS announcement of edXML discussion list Karl F. Best 2002-06-17 14:58
00578 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Python implementation of Regular Fragmentations and online demo Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-17 15:10
00533 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema John Cowan 2002-06-17 15:34
00544 RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-17 15:46
00543 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Francis Norton 2002-06-17 16:13
00576 RE: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs Julian Reschke 2002-06-17 16:43
00534 Re: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs Mark Baker 2002-06-17 16:49
00587 Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: DSDL: use John Cowan 2002-06-17 17:21
00574 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Arjun Ray 2002-06-17 17:50
00591 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? John Cowan 2002-06-17 17:58
00616 RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-17 18:03
00601 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? John Cowan 2002-06-17 18:11
00553 RE: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-17 18:18
00571 RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL? Micah Dubinko 2002-06-17 19:00
00570 Parse Error - Invalid Character Karl Stubsjoen 2002-06-17 19:13
00555 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed Dennis Sosnoski 2002-06-17 19:34
00599 Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed John Cowan 2002-06-17 19:41
00617 Re: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character Dennis Sosnoski 2002-06-17 19:45
00615 Re: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character Dennis Sosnoski 2002-06-17 19:57
00604 RE: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character Karl Stubsjoen 2002-06-17 19:57
00528 ANNOUNCE: RDF Gateway v0.9.5 Released Derrish Repchick 2002-06-17 20:47
00537 New presentation about XML Schema Datatypes John Cowan 2002-06-17 21:36
00593 Updated Unicode presentation from XML 2001 John Cowan 2002-06-17 21:42
00585 XUL available application, examples, demo. development? Trevor Croll 2002-06-17 23:00
00583 RE: [xml-dev] XUL available application, examples, demo. development? Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-06-18 00:03
00594 Re: [xml-dev] XUL available application, examples, demo. development? Trevor Croll 2002-06-18 00:12
00536 Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces and DTDs - Why not use what we have? Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-18 03:03
00530 Re: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-18 04:26
00525 Re: [xml-dev] simple and easiest method to input data thro telephone Peter Davis 2002-06-18 05:30
00542 RE: [xml-dev] XUL available application, examples, demo. development? bryan 2002-06-18 07:35
00523 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema [email protected] 2002-06-18 08:28
00581 RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Anderson, John 2002-06-18 08:46
00596 RE: [xml-dev] New presentation about XML Schema Datatypes Michael Kay 2002-06-18 08:56
00597 [ANN] Update of Topologi Schematron Validator adds RELAX NG Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-18 09:19
00580 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-18 09:46
00527 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Francis Norton 2002-06-18 10:36
00539 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema John Cowan 2002-06-18 11:40
00529 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema [email protected] 2002-06-18 11:46
00605 RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Anderson, John 2002-06-18 12:04
00535 Re: [xml-dev] XUL available application, examples, demo. development? Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-06-18 12:04
00612 RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-18 13:55
00569 RE: [xml-dev] XUL available application, examples, demo. development? bryan 2002-06-18 15:02
00556 ANNOUNCE: Stylus Studio 4.0 Now Available -- Free Adam Abrevaya 2002-06-18 17:20
00559 Re: [xml-dev] ANNOUNCE: Stylus Studio 4.0 Now Available -- Free Danny Vint 2002-06-18 17:40
00566 RE: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character Karl Stubsjoen 2002-06-18 18:03
00538 Re: [xml-dev] simple and easiest method to input data thro telephone raghavendran 2002-06-18 18:04
00613 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Eddie Robertsson 2002-06-18 23:49
00603 Re: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-19 00:37
00618 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Paul Spencer 2002-06-19 08:18
00600 Software Integration Markup Language? Gustaf Liljegren 2002-06-19 10:48
00558 RE: [xml-dev] Software Integration Markup Language? bryan 2002-06-19 11:28
00567 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-19 12:07
00614 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Francis Norton 2002-06-19 12:20
00602 OASIS TC Call For Participation: Management Protocol TC Karl F. Best 2002-06-19 12:33
00606 What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned? (WAS RE: [ xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-19 13:16
00611 OASIS TC Call For Participation: Automotive Repair Information TC Karl F. Best 2002-06-19 13:45
00568 RE: [xml-dev] New presentation about XML Schema Datatypes Jeff Lowery 2002-06-19 18:39
00557 SAX Question Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-19 21:11
00572 Xerces-C++ and std::string Corey A. Spitzer 2002-06-19 21:20
00554 Re: [xml-dev] SAX Question John Cowan 2002-06-19 21:23
00598 Re: [xml-dev] What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned? (WAS RE: [ xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema) Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-20 03:36
00579 Re: [xml-dev] SAX Question Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-20 03:40
00526 Re: [xml-dev] SAX Question Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-20 03:43
00540 Re: [xml-dev] What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema) Jonathan Borden 2002-06-20 03:55
00541 Re: [xml-dev] SAX Question Rob Lugt 2002-06-20 08:33
00524 Ann: Xml Validation Interoperability Framework (xvif) Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-20 09:11
00582 Re: XML to DTD Converter [email protected] 2002-06-20 10:24
00595 Format Output Nguyen La Yen Dung 2002-06-20 11:13
00584 Ann: Schemachine (a pipelined Xml validation framework) Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-20 14:54
00592 A high-speed non-validating parser Matt Fausey 2002-06-20 15:23
00689 (location.pathname.substring(0,6) robin 2002-06-20 15:26
00675 Extreme Markup Languages Program Now Available...Join other XML-D ev participants in Montreal Elledge, Marion 2002-06-20 15:37
00646 xvif: fallback mechanism Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-21 07:13
00631 xvif: not for schemas only Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-21 07:31
00632 RE: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character Joshua Allen 2002-06-21 08:44
00645 Re: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-21 10:18
00690 Re: [xml-dev] Ann: Schemachine (a pipelined Xml validation framework) Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-21 10:21
00673 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema [email protected] 2002-06-21 14:53
00688 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema [email protected] 2002-06-21 15:00
00677 Re: [xml-dev] What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned? (WAS RE: [ xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema) [email protected] 2002-06-21 15:04
00662 Re: [xml-dev] What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned?(WAS RE: [ xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema) Paul Prescod 2002-06-21 15:12
00650 Relax Lexical vs XML Lexical structure Doug Ransom 2002-06-21 17:39
00710 Re: [xml-dev] Relax Lexical vs XML Lexical structure Paul Prescod 2002-06-21 17:49
00719 RE: [xml-dev] Relax Lexical vs XML Lexical structure Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-21 17:54
00720 XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Rick Taylor 2002-06-21 18:02
00709 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-21 18:05
00652 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt John Cowan 2002-06-21 18:11
00661 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-21 18:14
00648 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt John Cowan 2002-06-21 18:16
00663 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-21 18:26
00647 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt John Evdemon 2002-06-21 18:47
00665 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Roger L. Costello 2002-06-21 18:55
00708 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-21 18:58
00721 How to Unsubscribe [email protected] 2002-06-21 18:58
00707 Relax NG Projects J. David Eisenberg 2002-06-21 19:00
00722 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-21 19:02
00664 RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-21 19:33
00649 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Roger L. Costello 2002-06-21 19:37
00660 RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-21 19:42
00651 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-21 19:48
00686 RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-21 19:50
00678 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt John Cowan 2002-06-21 19:53
00644 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Brothers, Michael (IA) 2002-06-21 20:00
00633 Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects John Cowan 2002-06-21 20:00
00643 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-21 20:09
00676 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt John Cowan 2002-06-21 20:11
00634 stopping XML (was RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects) Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-21 20:12
00687 RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-21 20:16
00674 Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-21 20:16
00691 Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects John Cowan 2002-06-21 20:25
00716 RE: [xml-dev] stopping XML (was RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-21 20:32
00701 RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects J. David Eisenberg 2002-06-21 20:39
00653 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Mike Champion 2002-06-21 21:16
00671 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Murali Mani 2002-06-21 21:26
00670 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt John Cowan 2002-06-21 21:27
00655 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-21 21:33
00699 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt John Cowan 2002-06-21 21:46
00717 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Michael Fitzgerald 2002-06-21 22:11
00704 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Michael Fitzgerald 2002-06-21 22:26
00715 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-22 07:09
00637 Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Steven Noels 2002-06-22 07:34
00628 Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-22 07:47
00693 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-22 07:58
00685 [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-22 08:15
00694 xmlschemata.org (was: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt) Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-22 08:47
00683 RE: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Michael Kay 2002-06-22 08:49
00636 Re: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Matt Gushee 2002-06-22 08:55
00630 RE: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Michael Leditschke 2002-06-22 10:35
00638 Re: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Steven Noels 2002-06-22 10:40
00625 [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-22 11:25
00642 Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects walter kriha 2002-06-22 12:31
00681 Re: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-22 14:41
00623 Re: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects james anderson 2002-06-22 14:43
00696 Re: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-22 14:44
00697 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Michael Fitzgerald 2002-06-22 15:41
00680 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Jason Diamond 2002-06-22 18:08
00627 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-22 18:19
00639 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-22 18:29
00629 Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Kohsuke Kawaguchi 2002-06-22 18:43
00635 RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-22 19:10
00705 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-22 19:15
00712 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt J. David Eisenberg 2002-06-22 19:46
00669 Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Kohsuke Kawaguchi 2002-06-22 19:48
00656 RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-22 20:18
00659 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt John Cowan 2002-06-22 22:10
00666 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt John Cowan 2002-06-22 22:27
00713 RE: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Ramin Firoozye 2002-06-22 23:20
00703 Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Kohsuke Kawaguchi 2002-06-22 23:29
00718 Re: [xml-dev] RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt John Cowan 2002-06-22 23:48
00700 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt James Clark 2002-06-23 00:26
00658 RE: [xml-dev] RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-23 05:15
00667 Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Rob Lugt 2002-06-23 20:38
00714 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-23 20:41
00702 on the subject of schema crunching... Paul Brown 2002-06-23 20:49
00706 RE: [xml-dev] on the subject of schema crunching... Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-23 20:57
00711 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Paul Prescod 2002-06-23 21:20
00668 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Rob Lugt 2002-06-23 21:24
00657 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-23 21:26
00672 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Rob Lugt 2002-06-23 21:48
00654 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-23 21:51
00698 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Rob Lugt 2002-06-23 21:56
00679 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Tim Bray 2002-06-23 22:05
00640 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier John Cowan 2002-06-23 22:18
00626 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Paul Prescod 2002-06-23 22:19
00641 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML Paul Prescod 2002-06-23 22:27
00624 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML Tim Bray 2002-06-23 22:30
00682 RE: [xml-dev] on the subject of schema crunching... Paul Brown 2002-06-23 22:34
00695 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-23 22:35
00684 Logical markup Language Trevor Croll 2002-06-23 23:09
00692 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Steve Ball 2002-06-23 23:33
00775 Updated on 6 ndw 2002-06-23 23:51
00789 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Eddie Robertsson 2002-06-24 01:28
00746 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-24 01:49
00731 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-24 03:33
00790 RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Don Box 2002-06-24 03:37
00732 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Eddie Robertsson 2002-06-24 03:40
00745 Re: [xml-dev] on the subject of schema crunching... Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-24 03:42
00788 RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Don Box 2002-06-24 03:54
00773 Re: [xml-dev] Logical markup Language Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-24 04:02
00777 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-24 04:15
00762 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-24 04:19
00750 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-24 04:31
00810 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? James Clark 2002-06-24 05:15
00819 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Paul Prescod 2002-06-24 05:25
00820 RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Don Box 2002-06-24 05:32
00809 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? W. E. Perry 2002-06-24 05:37
00752 Namespace declaration using DOM pradeep bhat 2002-06-24 06:41
00761 Namespace declaration using DOM pradeep bhat 2002-06-24 08:36
00748 RE: [xml-dev] Logical markup Language Danny Ayers 2002-06-24 08:46
00763 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Rob Lugt 2002-06-24 08:58
00747 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML Rob Lugt 2002-06-24 09:05
00765 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Jeni Tennison 2002-06-24 09:18
00808 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML Sean McGrath 2002-06-24 10:42
00821 Re: [xml-dev] Updated on 6 Norman Walsh 2002-06-24 10:54
00822 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? John Cowan 2002-06-24 11:40
00764 RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-24 11:52
00749 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? John Cowan 2002-06-24 12:02
00807 Re: [xml-dev] schema management for a document pipeline: request for comment Robin LaFontaine 2002-06-24 12:05
00760 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-24 12:14
00751 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-24 12:25
00786 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-24 12:31
00778 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-24 12:37
00733 Representing interdependence of elements within a schema or dtd John Rivett-Carnac 2002-06-24 12:47
00744 Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration using DOM Christian Nentwich 2002-06-24 12:52
00743 RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-24 13:25
00734 Second edition of XML in a Nutshell published Elliotte Rusty Harold 2002-06-24 13:30
00776 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Uche Ogbuji 2002-06-24 13:37
00787 RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML McNally, David 2002-06-24 13:41
00774 RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-24 14:42
00791 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? John Cowan 2002-06-24 14:58
00816 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-24 15:08
00801 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? W. E. Perry 2002-06-24 15:09
00753 RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-24 15:40
00771 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? W. E. Perry 2002-06-24 16:09
00770 RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-24 16:17
00755 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML Tim Bray 2002-06-24 16:30
00799 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? W. E. Perry 2002-06-24 16:33
00817 RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-24 16:47
00804 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML Paul Prescod 2002-06-24 17:26
00815 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-24 17:37
00728 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Robin LaFontaine 2002-06-24 18:43
00737 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML J.Pietschmann 2002-06-24 19:17
00793 Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration using DOM J.Pietschmann 2002-06-24 19:30
00785 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Jeff Lowery 2002-06-24 20:20
00783 XML Startkabel updates xml startkabel 2002-06-24 21:26
00794 Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration using DOM Uche Ogbuji 2002-06-24 21:31
00725 Re: [xml-dev] Second edition of XML in a Nutshell published Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-24 23:55
00736 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Eddie Robertsson 2002-06-25 00:21
00730 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt Eddie Robertsson 2002-06-25 00:26
00738 RE: [xml-dev] Intuition and XML Schema restriction (was: XML Sche ma to relaxNG xslt) Jeff Lowery 2002-06-25 01:07
00742 Re: [xml-dev] Representing interdependence of elements within a schema or dtd Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-25 03:37
00723 help - Writing schema pradeep bhat 2002-06-25 06:26
00781 Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-25 07:38
00796 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Sean McGrath 2002-06-25 07:44
00797 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Sean McGrath 2002-06-25 08:01
00780 Re: [xml-dev] help - Writing schema Jeni Tennison 2002-06-25 09:13
00727 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Paul Prescod 2002-06-25 12:09
00739 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? John Cowan 2002-06-25 12:20
00729 Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Jeff Rafter 2002-06-25 12:31
00735 Re: [xml-dev] on the subject of schema crunching... Francis Norton 2002-06-25 12:45
00805 Objects vs. XML aka LISP and How History Repeats Itself Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-25 13:25
00812 Java - XMLReader and SAX Filters Filipe Correia 2002-06-25 14:07
00769 [ANN] RelaxNGCC Ver.1.0 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 2002-06-25 14:22
00756 RE: [xml-dev] Java - XMLReader and SAX Filters Leigh Dodds 2002-06-25 14:23
00759 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-25 15:38
00766 RE: [xml-dev] Java - XMLReader and SAX Filters Filipe Correia 2002-06-25 15:42
00803 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des John Cowan 2002-06-25 15:50
00813 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML Joe English 2002-06-25 15:50
00818 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-25 16:05
00800 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-25 16:06
00758 RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema Anderson, John 2002-06-25 16:14
00767 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-25 16:39
00814 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML Tim Bray 2002-06-25 16:50
00802 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML Michael Kay 2002-06-25 17:39
00806 RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Doug Ransom 2002-06-25 18:07
00811 RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Doug Ransom 2002-06-25 18:18
00768 RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Doug Ransom 2002-06-25 18:26
00757 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML Michael Fitzgerald 2002-06-25 18:44
00772 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-25 18:48
00754 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-25 18:54
00798 Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML) Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-25 18:58
00779 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-25 19:37
00726 RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML Sean McGrath 2002-06-25 19:41
00740 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-25 19:59
00741 [offtopic] A message from the rebellion. Garland foster 2002-06-25 20:40
00724 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML Tim Bray 2002-06-25 20:59
00782 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-25 21:07
00795 Re: [xml-dev] Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (andeasier to author) XML) Jeff Rafter 2002-06-25 22:29
00784 RE: [xml-dev] Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (andeasier to author) XML) Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-25 22:29
00792 Re: [xml-dev] Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (andeasier to author) XML) Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-25 22:39
00875 RE: [xml-dev] Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (andeasier to author) XML) Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-25 22:44
00889 Re: [xml-dev] Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly lessverbose (andeasier to author) XML) Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-06-25 23:16
00846 [ANN] VLDB-EEXTT Call for Participation and Program Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-25 23:23
00831 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML Jonathan Borden 2002-06-26 03:04
00832 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-26 06:09
00845 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-26 06:48
00890 Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-26 06:57
00873 Sablotron 0.95 Petr Cimprich 2002-06-26 07:38
00888 Re: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema [email protected] 2002-06-26 08:09
00877 RE: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects Anderson, John 2002-06-26 10:15
00000 parsing a DTD without having the entities resolved. Koen De Maesschalck 2002-06-26 10:46
00862 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML John Cowan 2002-06-26 12:09
00850 RE: [xml-dev] [offtopic] A message from the rebellion. Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-26 13:05
00910 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML Jeni Tennison 2002-06-26 13:34
00851 grammar Nurul Haszeli Ahmad 2002-06-26 13:43
00920 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-26 13:56
00909 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-26 13:57
00852 RE: [xml-dev] Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE Manos Batsis 2002-06-26 13:59
00919 Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE Roger L. Costello 2002-06-26 14:00
00861 Re: [xml-dev] Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE Mike Champion 2002-06-26 14:02
00848 OASIS announcement of Online Dispute Resolution discussion list Karl F. Best 2002-06-26 14:20
00863 XML schema for non-XML file? Yaneric Roussel 2002-06-26 14:30
00847 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-26 15:23
00865 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-26 15:29
00921 Re: [xml-dev] XML schema for non-XML file? Eric Bohlman 2002-06-26 15:55
00908 [ANNOUNCE] XPB4J-0.90: Java Program to measure and compare XML P arsing/Processing performance KUMAR,PANKAJ (HP-Cupertino,ex1) 2002-06-26 18:25
00907 RE: [xml-dev] XML schema for non-XML file? Michael Leditschke 2002-06-27 00:17
00922 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-27 00:23
00864 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, John Cowan 2002-06-27 00:46
00849 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-27 00:50
00860 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, John Cowan 2002-06-27 00:57
00886 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-27 03:06
00878 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, Jonathan Borden 2002-06-27 03:13
00833 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, John Cowan 2002-06-27 03:31
00844 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-27 06:39
00843 English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, Jonathan Borden 2002-06-27 11:30
00834 Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, John Cowan 2002-06-27 12:06
00876 Re: [xml-dev] English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-27 12:07
00874 Re: [xml-dev] Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, Jonathan Borden 2002-06-27 12:22
00887 [ANN] <oXygen/> XML Editor 1.2 - available also Online as an Applet George Cristian Bina 2002-06-27 12:33
00916 Re: [xml-dev] English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XMLSchema, Jonathan Borden 2002-06-27 12:33
00901 Re: [xml-dev] Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, Jonathan Borden 2002-06-27 12:41
00891 Re: [xml-dev] Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-27 13:01
00853 Re: [xml-dev] English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XMLSchema, Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-27 13:05
00871 Re: [xml-dev] Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-27 14:04
00870 Re: [xml-dev] Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, John Cowan 2002-06-27 14:48
00855 RE: [xml-dev] Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE Kimberly Hahn 2002-06-27 14:59
00899 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML Sean McGrath 2002-06-27 17:56
00917 RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-27 18:25
00904 Re: [xml-dev] English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-27 22:17
00915 Re: [xml-dev] Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-27 22:24
00828 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-27 22:27
00837 [XPB4J] RE: What's XSLT doing in here? KUMAR,PANKAJ (HP-Cupertino,ex1) 2002-06-28 04:18
00893 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, John Cowan 2002-06-28 05:42
00885 Re: [xml-dev] English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-28 06:49
00883 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, Eric van der Vlist 2002-06-28 08:02
00894 Proposal for an introspector collaboration toolchain James Michael DuPont 2002-06-28 08:22
00836 Partial validation in RelaxNG? Gustaf Liljegren 2002-06-28 09:58
00830 Re: [xml-dev] Partial validation in RelaxNG? James Clark 2002-06-28 10:18
00838 Re: [xml-dev] Partial validation in RelaxNG? Jeni Tennison 2002-06-28 10:22
00825 XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML MAISONNY Benoit 2002-06-28 12:08
00842 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-06-28 12:24
00823 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML Ann Navarro 2002-06-28 13:00
00881 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer 2002-06-28 13:17
00896 XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema Bill de hÓra 2002-06-28 13:20
00880 RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-28 13:45
00897 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-28 13:45
00839 RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema Bill de hÓra 2002-06-28 13:55
00827 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXM L MAISONNY Benoit 2002-06-28 13:55
00829 RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema Bill de hÓra 2002-06-28 14:01
00835 RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema Danny Ayers 2002-06-28 14:12
00905 RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-28 14:35
00912 Are there any limits? (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object p rogrammers: was Announce: XML Schema) Bullard, Claude L (Len) 2002-06-28 14:50
00869 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-28 16:00
00856 Re: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema Uche Ogbuji 2002-06-28 20:53
00859 Re: [xml-dev] Are there any limits? (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object p rogrammers: was Announce: XML Schema) Uche Ogbuji 2002-06-28 20:58
00866 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML Jonathan Borden 2002-06-29 04:01
00913 Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, Jonathan Borden 2002-06-29 04:07
00903 Re: [xml-dev] Are there any limits? (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema) Jonathan Borden 2002-06-29 04:12
00918 Unique XForms form that can ...instance data? tariq abdur-rahim 2002-06-29 06:47
00900 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML Dare Obasanjo 2002-06-29 10:05
00858 Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation? (was: RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML) MAISONNY Benoit 2002-06-29 10:51
00867 Re: [xml-dev] Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation? (was: RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML) Rick Jelliffe 2002-06-29 12:20
00914 RE: [xml-dev] Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation? (was: RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML) MAISONNY Benoit 2002-06-29 13:08
00902 Non-xml syntax for WXS Sean McGrath 2002-06-29 15:08
00906 Re: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS Simon St.Laurent 2002-06-29 15:31
00911 RE: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS Michael Fitzgerald 2002-06-29 22:00
00868 RE: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS Bill de hÓra 2002-06-30 00:10
00857 Re: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS J. David Eisenberg 2002-06-30 02:32
00872 Re: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS Paul Prescod 2002-06-30 05:19
00854 Re: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS J. David Eisenberg 2002-06-30 05:35
00898 Re: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS Eric Bohlman 2002-06-30 06:18
00879 Re: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS Jeff Rafter 2002-06-30 12:39
00826 XML Problem Sebastian A. 2002-06-30 15:59
00840 Re: [xml-dev] XML Problem Thomas B. Passin 2002-06-30 16:18
00841 RE: [xml-dev] XML Problem Sebastian A. 2002-06-30 17:29
00824 Re: [xml-dev] XML Problem Henrik Motakef 2002-06-30 17:53
00882 RE: [xml-dev] Non-xml syntax for WXS Michael Kay 2002-06-30 19:30
00895 CHAT: Bagels and lox John Cowan 2002-06-30 20:37
00884 Re: Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation? Rob Lugt 2002-06-30 21:24
00923 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML Jonathan Borden 2002-07-01 02:30
00892 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML Ann Navarro 2002-07-01 03:39