[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Hmmm... You are right.
For some reason, I had 2 versions of xhtml-special.ent in separate
directories and I checked the wrong one. I'll get rid of the bogus one,
promised! :-)
Sorry about this.
Benoit
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Lugt [mailto:roblugt@elcel.com]
> Sent: 30 June 2002 23:25
> To: Benoit.MAISONNY@eurocontrol.int; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation?
>
>
> Benoit Maisonny wrote:
>
> >I did further tests with the "bogus" DTD and the other
> parsers. I think it
> >can be interesting to report that here. I simply added
> "<" somewhere in
> >my sample XML instance and tried to validate it. Results:
>
> > ElCel's xmlvalid 0.14.7 doesn't and reports:
> > xhtml-special.ent [37:20] : Fatal error: entity reference
> > must start with a letter, '_' or ':'
> > Note that the lt entity is in fact on line 35, not 37.
>
> Hi Benoit,
>
> I found your assertion that xmlvalid was getting the line number wrong
> alarming, so I down-loaded the xhtml modularization files to
> take a look.
> I'm not sure why you think that the "lt" entity is on line
> 35, because in
> the copy I downloaded [1] it does indeed appear on line 37.
>
> Regards
> ~Rob
>
> --
> Rob Lugt
> ElCel Technology
> http://www.elcel.com/
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/xhtml-modularization.zip
>
|
