Lists Home |
Date Index |
Hmmm... You are right.
For some reason, I had 2 versions of xhtml-special.ent in separate
directories and I checked the wrong one. I'll get rid of the bogus one,
Sorry about this.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Lugt [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: 30 June 2002 23:25
> To: Benoit.MAISONNY@eurocontrol.int; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation?
> Benoit Maisonny wrote:
> >I did further tests with the "bogus" DTD and the other
> parsers. I think it
> >can be interesting to report that here. I simply added
> "<" somewhere in
> >my sample XML instance and tried to validate it. Results:
> > ElCel's xmlvalid 0.14.7 doesn't and reports:
> > xhtml-special.ent [37:20] : Fatal error: entity reference
> > must start with a letter, '_' or ':'
> > Note that the lt entity is in fact on line 35, not 37.
> Hi Benoit,
> I found your assertion that xmlvalid was getting the line number wrong
> alarming, so I down-loaded the xhtml modularization files to
> take a look.
> I'm not sure why you think that the "lt" entity is on line
> 35, because in
> the copy I downloaded  it does indeed appear on line 37.
> Rob Lugt
> ElCel Technology
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/xhtml-modularization.zip