[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 05:02 PM 7/3/2002 +0100, Michael Kay wrote:
>Can you provide evidence for this?
Just conversations at conferences with editors of various
specifications. I fear I don't normally carry a tape recorder.
>I've done a search on the archives
>(it would have been easier if relax were not a normal English verb) and
>I can't find any. There are a number of individual messages that mention
>RELAX in passing, e.g. to illustrate alternative type semantics; but no
>minutes that indicate that RELAX has ever been discussed or "brushed
>aside".
I think there may be a difference between "being aware of something and
discussing it privately" and "formally introducing it into the working
group as an issue".
> > at one point I
> > understood the formal model had much more in common with
> > RELAX NG than with W3C XML Schema.
>
>That might well be true. Integration with Schema has certainly been at
>times a painful process: I never suggested otherwise.
I find it remarkable how many masochists appear to be on that committee. I
don't know how else to explain such a strange phenomenon.
Simon St.Laurent
"Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue
|
