[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@catcode.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] House of Representatives using XML
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 19:41:31 -0700
- Thread-index: AcIjwiOEEXCXJcpISUKX77F7TjN2tgACmqEr
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] House of Representatives using XML
REASON No. 29 WHY I CAN'T STAND SLASHDOT*
A comment stating that XDR is "upward compatible" with W3C XML Schema [whatever that means] is rated +5 Informative.
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=35398&cid=3823323
* Yet like a train wreck I am morbidly drawn to it.
-----Original Message-----
From: J. David Eisenberg [mailto:catcode@catcode.com]
Sent: Thu 7/4/2002 6:20 PM
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Cc:
Subject: [xml-dev] House of Representatives using XML
I got notice of this from an article at slashdot:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/07/04/1631254
The relevant URL is http://xml.house.gov/ They are using DTDs, although
there is one interesting file (not shown on the main page):
http://xml.house.gov/Members/member-schema.xml
which starts off with this:
<Schema xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xml-data"
xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes">
The discussion at slashdot does bring up the (by now notorious)
DTD vs. Schema vs. Relax NG debate.
--
J. David Eisenberg http://catcode.com/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|