Lists Home |
Date Index |
> To be more accurate I should have said 'REST did not come solely *after*
> the fact as you appear to be implying'.
> I was responding to your assertion that the 'REST camp' is based on a
> logical fallacy - 'Post hoc propter hoc' i.e. "after the fact, therefore
> because of the fact".
Yes, that is exactly what I believe.
I look forward to someone with better memories (and mail archives:)
proving me wrong.