Re: [xml-dev] Fine namespace control in XML Schema

[Daniel Prager <danielp@deakin.edu.au>]

Hi Eddie

Thanks -- this is certainly getting close to what I would ideally like.

Your 3 schemas are a great step forward, but they do admit a false
positive (taking the RELAX NG definition as canonical) by passing
the following document as valid:

<a:frog xmlns:a="http://www.example.com/a";>
 <name> Spotted tree frog </name>
 <colour> Blue with red spots </colour>
 <leap> minimal </leap>
</a:frog>

Great step forward; can you (or anyone) do even better?


Thanks again

Daniel