[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Mike Champion scripsit:
> BTW, can anyone explain the RELAX NG philosophy of how one associates an
> instance with a schema? [I have a DOM WG action item to check with the
> RELAX NG folks about this, and this post just reminded me!!!]
There is no standard way, for several reasons:
1) A receiver often wants to check the document against a standard
schema, not one specified by the sender which may not be equivalent.
2) It makes sense to check a document against different schemas for
different purposes. In particular, checking XHTML involves three
different schemas, the "main" one and two that check various
exclusions (e.g. no A elements within A elements).
3) It's really a special case of the general XML processing problem,
which should be solved with a general solution.
--
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
http://www.reutershealth.com http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
.e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
Please support Lojban! http://www.lojban.org
|