[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> If he says that is "easily integratible" based
> on that draft, it is inconsistent. The holes
> are there and you will be spit out in 1989.
This is your basis for calling Clark's assertions inconsistent? If every
distant contingency of any set of statements were to be considered in judging
whether those statements were consistent, then there would be no such thing as
a set of statements that are consistent.
In other words, I think you're splitting hairs quite needlessly.
If you have this argument to make about namespace dereferencing, you'll have a
stronger case just making the argument. The way you introduced it just makes
it too easy to write off as a quiddity.
--
Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com
Track chair, XML/Web Services One Boston: http://www.xmlconference.com/
The many heads of XML modeling - http://adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6393
Will XML live up to its promise? - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think11.html
|
