OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: [xml-dev] Article: Keeping pace with James Clark

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

If you believe that, then you haven't been paying 
attention.  This issue is the black hole of WWW 

See W3C TAG thread, 

"RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem"

Fashion is, IMO, not the way to design interoperable 


From: Joe English [mailto:jenglish@flightlab.com]

Bullard, Claude L wrote:

> It is not healthy to be an ostrich among the coyotes.
> Is or is not a URI dereferenceable?  If you say,
> it depends, you have your head in the sand.

I would say that a URL is dereferencable, unequivocably.
It locates a resource.

But URLs are out of fashion.  The current mode
is to Identify resources, not Locate them.  URIs are
used in several W3C specs -- RDF and XMLNS being the
most prominent -- as opaque, atomic identifiers
that have no semantics other than identity.

If you say that a URI must be dereferencable just
because it looks like a URL, then you haven't been
paying attention.


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS