Lists Home |
Date Index |
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 12:53:51PM -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Ahhh. But many vendors (including Microsoft) have shipped DOM
> implementations that enable XPath queries. Also the W3C DOM working group
> is in the process of standardizing XPath over the DOM as we speak
> so you can't just punt and say it shouldn't happen and is thus undefined
> since it already does.
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-DOM-Level-3-XPath-20020328/
Well this either ain't exactly XPath or either ain't exactly DOM.
The issue of the divergence between the XPath data model and DOM has
been known from quite a long time, it should not appear as a surprise.
I do think that providing XPath as a DOM extension makes a lot of
sense from a toolkit perspective (I do it too !) but IMHO the XPath
data representation subset should be used on trees manipulated with
XPath (since it's the smallest subset functionnalities wise).
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
email@example.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/