xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Question for the XPath and DOM folks

Re: [xml-dev] Question for the XPath and DOM folks

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com (Uche Ogbuji)
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Question for the XPath and DOM folks
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 01:25:15 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: mc@xegesis.org (Mike Champion), xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <E17W7KP-0006bv-00@malatesta.local> from "Uche Ogbuji" at Jul 20, 2002 09:23:52 PM

Uche Ogbuji scripsit:

> I should make the point, though, that Megginson's choices in SAX 1.0 do seem 
> remarkably prescient.  It came after DOM L1, but only a little bit afterwards. 
>  Also, IIRC, Megginson also waved off the SML crowd, so it's interesting that 
> SAX got things so rightly.

ESIS had a lot to do with it, I think.

-- 
John Cowan                                   jcowan@reutershealth.com
        "You need a change: try Canada"  "You need a change: try China"
                --fortune cookies opened by a couple that I know

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] Question for the XPath and DOM folks
  - From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Question for the XPath and DOM folks
  - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] URIs harmful (was RE: [xml-dev] Article: Keeping pace with James Clark)
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Question for the XPath and DOM folks
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Question for the XPath and DOM folks
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Question for the XPath and DOM folks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread