Lists Home |
Date Index |
Tim Bray wrote:
> Joe English wrote:
> There is for URLs, but not for URNs. There are those who claim this
> is an advantage; but in any case it is certain that there are lots of
> things in the world which are URIs but are not de jure nor de facto
> dereferencable. Deal with it. -Tim
Deal with it? Come on, Tim!
We've been dealing with this for years, and namespaces are a still
time-wasting mess that gives XML a lousy reputation for inscrutable
specs about which no one agrees. This may not seem difficult to deal
with on a case-by-case basis, but it's made the general case damn near
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!