[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I've used URN:... in a schema namespace in XMLSpy since
V3 without a problem.
Regards
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas B. Passin [mailto:tpassin@comcast.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, 23 July 2002 11:47 AM
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] URIs harmful (was RE: [xml-dev] Article: Keeping
> pa ce with James Clark)
>
>
> [Bullard, Claude L (Len)]
>
>
> > Obtuse. The real world works as I have described it. The
> > fantasy world of URIs as unique ids of unique resources
> > doesn't work as long as their is an HTTP in the morph and
> > the syntax for naming and resolution are identical.
> >
>
> Yes, and I found out the hard way that some "Web Services"
> tookits will not
> accept arbitrary URI schemes - had to stick with http: URLs. I think I
> recall that XML Spy did not like non-http: schemes for schema namespaces
> either, but i am a bit hazy - put that at about 80% sure. So you
> cannot in
> actual practice try to evade the issue by using "uri:xxx:yyy" instead of
> some non-responding http: URI, depending on what tools you work
> with. Ugh.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tom P
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
|
