[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "David Hunter" <dhunter@viafone.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] DNS based URIs that don't imply access method
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 09:41:43 -0700
- Thread-index: AcIz+e8QdyL0aLAdQhmWJgCqDic71gAAB+Pg
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] DNS based URIs that don't imply access method
The confusion has spread far and wide even amongst people building XML
tools and technologies.
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
He who laughs last didn't catch on very fast, did he?
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Hunter [mailto:dhunter@viafone.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 9:37 AM
> To: 'xml-dev@lists.xml.org '
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] DNS based URIs that don't imply access method
>
>
> True, but I think we've heard from numerous people on this
> list who would testify that the confusion caused by using
> URIs for namespace names extends well beyond the borders of
> XML-DEV. (I would argue that the people on this list are the
> ones best qualified to understand this stuff. If we don't,
> or argue about it incessantly, what chance does the average
> developer have to understand it?)
>
> And again, if my previous post didn't make it clear, there
> must be an easier way to provide uniqueness. Proponents of
> URIs like to say that "it's easier than generating GUIDs", as
> if there's no middle ground, but my point in bringing up Java
> package names is that I don't think GUIDs and URIs are the
> only two alternatives available to us...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny Ayers
> To: David Hunter; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Sent: 7/25/2002 12:06 PM
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] DNS based URIs that don't imply access method
>
> >The costs (mass confusion, thousands upon thousands of emails to
> XML-DEV,
> >thousands of person-hours burned on discussing the issue ad
> infinitum)
> just
> >seem to vastly outweigh the benefits (easier uniqueness) of using
> certain
> >types of URI (HTTP URLs being the most common, and most ill-fitted,
> >example, IMHO).
>
> Costs that only apply to xml-dev subscribers don't really add
> much weight in the general scheme of things. Easier
> uniqueness is a big benefit all round.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org
> <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS
<http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|